[IPsec] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 19 October 2022 13:06 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29178C152714; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 06:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs@ietf.org, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org, kivinen@iki.fi, kivinen@iki.fi
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.18.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <166618478716.49928.5889814632808402007@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 06:06:27 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/yL0A1Fe5d-bTK2AKTAR58ZT-OHE>
Subject: [IPsec] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:06:27 -0000

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-08: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification.

I am balloting a Discuss, so that we pick the correct default value of congestionControl object.

- Section 4.2 says

    congestionControl OBJECT-TYPE
        SYNTAX      TruthValue
        MAX-ACCESS  read-only
        STATUS      current
        DESCRIPTION
          "When set to true, the default, this enables the
          congestion control on-the-wire exchange of data that is
          required by congestion control algorithms as defined by
          RFC 5348.  When set to false, IP-TFS sends fixed-sized
          packets over an IP-TFS tunnel at a constant rate."
        DEFVAL { false }
        ::= { iptfsConfigTableEntry 2 }

   While the description says the default value should be true, the DEFVAL mentions "false".


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Brian Trammell for his TSVART review and I agree with this observations.