IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] terminology check: "modern IPsec protocol suite"

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 10 April 2020 00:01 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038363A1510 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bHhuQDh68n1d for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 836E63A1513 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48yypp5LgszFhl; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 02:01:22 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1586476882; bh=5URIZDJG0YUTN75Ks1BnbtOmxWHqiTneIGyGeoEulww=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To; b=Tfh6eeNXOi4psYXfahJARjJXWOvhN6PPVf/nFEllIz30UbgDoVBejFjOv77mmu87D XF8hYMgEB4budcaE38Oxg36HMXSDegLXwfMg99BK9VqXQane1XedJjBJepcbfyXrEz V/fbLCOfb9+dtNX50vKHnY6796Ig7houJQfbZFaQ=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L5MTZbRL4Sd1; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 02:01:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 02:01:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [193.111.228.74] (unknown [193.111.228.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1F606020CF9; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 19:07:00 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 19:07:00 -0400
Message-Id: <BCD14158-B05A-4353-82BD-3178640A3A1E@nohats.ca>
References: <20200409224640.GE44502@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Cc: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, ipsec@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20200409224640.GE44502@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/ykyUCKWzn9i0jBgHKhIVApJPLJk>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] terminology check: "modern IPsec protocol suite"
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 00:01:26 -0000

L
> On Apr 9, 2020, at 18:56, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> Does IPsec not also include AH as an option still ?

We don’t mention the Protocol That Shall Not Be Named, and recommend ESP-NULL instead.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email