Re: [Iptel] idnits draft-ietf-iptel-tel-enumdi-01

lconroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk> Sun, 06 November 2005 20:04 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EYqka-0005oT-Cf; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:04:24 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EX7Em-0003ux-L2 for iptel@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:16:25 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA28070 for <iptel@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:16:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 213-152-49-123.dsl.eclipse.net.uk ([213.152.49.123] helo=norman.insensate.co.uk) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EX7TB-0003az-Qi for iptel@ietf.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:31:23 -0500
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by norman.insensate.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A3E737AC; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 01:16:09 +0000 (GMT)
In-Reply-To: <BF88F25E.5D35B%fluffy@cisco.com>
References: <BF88F25E.5D35B%fluffy@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail-4-115628912"
Message-Id: <91A6319C-3917-44C7-8451-BF11080356C8@insensate.co.uk>
From: lconroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Iptel] idnits draft-ietf-iptel-tel-enumdi-01
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 01:16:07 +0000
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734)
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 214c4b9fd640cafeeaa09a981bfa7351
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:04:17 -0500
Cc: "iptel@ietf.org" <iptel@ietf.org>, Stastny Richard <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at>
X-BeenThere: iptel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Telephony <iptel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel>, <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/iptel>
List-Post: <mailto:iptel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel>, <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: iptel-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: iptel-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Cullen, folks,
  Well spotted.
Why Internet-drafts ->silently<- dropped the original attempt at -02  
I have no idea.
herewith the new, improved, -02 draft with updated boilerplate.
(from experience, if we submit it as -03, then it will be rejected as  
it replaces -01).

I also include an html file with the -01 to -02 delta from rfcdiff.

In terms of the review, yes - there is only one real change to the  
body text, and that
was to remove a typo (see the delta web page for details).

BTW, here is the idnits report on the new draft:
-----------------------------------------------
idnits 1.82

tmp/draft-ietf-iptel-tel-enumdi-02.txt:


   Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html:

     Checking conformance with RFC 3978/3979 boilerplate...

     the boilerplate looks good.
     No nits found.

   Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id- 
guidelines.txt:
     Nothing found here (but these checks do not cover all of
     1id-guidelines.txt yet).

   Miscellaneous warnings:
     None.

     No nits found.
-----------------------------------------------

enjoy - this one will go into internet-drafts after IETF shadow.

all the best,
   Lawrence
On 29 Oct 2005, at 17:33, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> Ok, I'm pretty sure I have tracked down what happened to this. The IPR
> statement is wrong and it was rejected. It looks like it has the  
> 3667 IPR
> boiler plate and it needs the 3978. Anything submitted after last May
> without the 3978 has been rejected.
>
> Check you xml has ipr="full3978". Run idnits. XML2RFC will generate  
> many
> things that contain all kinds of problems including lines too wide,  
> invalid
> characters, and bad IPR.
>
>
>> From a review point of view, it looks like there is no difference  
>> from the 01 version to the 02 version that got mailed to the list.  
>> Is that correct?
>
_______________________________________________
Iptel mailing list
Iptel@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel