Re: [Iptel] CPL as a standard for distinctive ringing

Jonathan Lennox <lennox@cs.columbia.edu> Wed, 04 February 2004 19:50 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA22287 for <iptel-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:50:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoT1k-0007Lx-7m for iptel-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:49:39 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i14JnaiR028264 for iptel-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:49:36 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoT1j-0007Ln-UD for iptel-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:49:35 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA22279 for <iptel-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:49:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoT1g-0004iB-00 for iptel-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:49:33 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AoT0s-0004cP-00 for iptel-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:48:43 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoT0H-0004Uv-00 for iptel-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:48:05 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoT0C-0007GX-Ll; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:48:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoSzo-0007Es-Ht for iptel@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:47:36 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA22235 for <iptel@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:47:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoSzl-0004Tj-00 for iptel@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:47:33 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AoSz1-0004NR-00 for iptel@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:46:47 -0500
Received: from cs.columbia.edu ([128.59.16.20]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoSyJ-0004Ff-00 for iptel@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:46:03 -0500
Received: from cnr.cs.columbia.edu (cnr.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.19.133]) by cs.columbia.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i14JjP3c005789 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:45:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cnr.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cnr.cs.columbia.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i14JjPfv044460; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:45:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lennox@cnr.cs.columbia.edu)
Received: (from lennox@localhost) by cnr.cs.columbia.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i14JjP1n044457; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:45:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lennox@cnr.cs.columbia.edu)
From: Jonathan Lennox <lennox@cs.columbia.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16417.19413.514429.166633@cnr.cs.columbia.edu>
To: ssa@hss.hns.com
Cc: iptel@ietf.org, xiaotaow@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Iptel] CPL as a standard for distinctive ringing
In-Reply-To: <OF1F7ABBF6.2687CC3B-ON65256E30.0046432A-65256E30.00475E0F@hss.hns.com>
References: <OF1F7ABBF6.2687CC3B-ON65256E30.0046432A-65256E30.00475E0F@hss.hns.com>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under Emacs 20.7.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: iptel-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: iptel-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: iptel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel>, <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IP Telephony <iptel.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:iptel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel>, <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/iptel/>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:45:25 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wednesday, February 4 2004, "ssa@hss.hns.com" wrote to "iptel@ietf.org, ssa@hss.hns.com" saying:

> This is regarding the suggested hypothetical extension to CPL
> (draft-ietf-iptel-cpl-08: chapter 12.10) for distinctive ringing.
> 
> This extension was originally proposed in the 03 version of the draft.
> Since then it has been kept as a "hypothetical" extension and _not_ as a
> "standard" action node in 5 more later versions including the latest 08
> version.
> 
> I would like to know the possibility/ acceptance of "ring"
> (draft-ietf-iptel-cpl-08: chapter 12.10) node coming in the standard CPL
> schema in future versions of the draft.
> 
> Also response from SIP proxy developers, who are following the suggested
> extension for their distinctive ringing implementation, will be
> appreciated.

CPL is intended as a language for controlling SIP proxy servers.  There's no
(standardized) way to implement distinctive ring in a proxy server; it needs
to be done by user agents.

You might want to take a look at Xiaotao Wu's LESS, the Language for End
System Services.  It's an extension of CPL designed for end-system control
of this sort.

-- 
Jonathan Lennox
lennox@cs.columbia.edu

_______________________________________________
Iptel mailing list
Iptel@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel