RE: [Iptel] IPTEL Agenda proposal

Thanks for the clarification. I will remove it.

Actually the only topic I wanted to discuss was if it was appropriate to
consider it in iptel or not. Glad that is already decided (and agree with
the decision).

Cullen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Shockey [mailto:richard@shockey.us]
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:23 AM
> To: Cullen Jennings; iptel@ietf.org
> Cc: Jonathan Rosenberg; fluffy@cisco.com; agenda@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Iptel] IPTEL Agenda proposal
>
>
> At 08:37 PM 3/16/2003 -0800, Cullen Jennings wrote:
>
> >I
> >10 min
> >Other URI schemes
> >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-brandner-enum-uri-01.txt
>
> Cullen the enumservice vovi draft is being handled in the ENUM WG along
> with all of the enumservice drafts not outside other WG's scope.
>
> The ENUM uri is defiantly a IPTEL document.
>
> This misunderstanding occurred because of a innocent misdirection
> from the
> ID editors..
>
> Apologies for the misunderstanding
>
> >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-brandner-enumservice-vo
> vi-00.txt
> >
> >May discuss
> >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wilde-sms-uri-03.txt
> >
> >10 min
> >Work needed before closing?
> >Charter Update - Chairs
> >
>
>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives
> NeuStar Inc.
> 46000 Center Oak Plaza  -   Sterling, VA  20166
> Voice +1 571.434.5651 Cell : +1 314.503.0640,  Fax: +1 815.333.1237
> <mailto:richard@shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey@neustar.biz>
>   <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
>

_______________________________________________
Iptel mailing list
Iptel@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel