Re: RFC4291bis

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 08 August 2018 01:31 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944E61274D0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NZcQ1r5SQGP6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DB2F127332 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id p12-v6so299888pfh.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 18:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ykL73XJe8UBFIAueTr4HVHE7qqZjPYxKixHiODjplgE=; b=mx98EPv0k639/7Qx//bnEZeZRrABYsdog3d3kg62SBZXkD2b7NK/+5Ejh9wbqJU7AI nkXc9Yw2Ko8KHHjjPkUaoKyb3X+qThv2QvoYmW3KhnR22jRVVCu9ZRHGJIQ4+BX2lpTN PymnWJ5n+M/A58zbqXpRAyvY/3wGrVL+MgYEAjm3gUVsnOn3DlhCpfCMtgEN3gJSVTPI fJHuPV2U+e2VWt8iEdkjdc/SMmefwjJ/0Dd86vZpTUiTeVP4aF3eP0ATEaHuZ1BkhDWm 1IdE04aduLBd2bK5MDvLgyS3uyZVbJ5xr6SuVh6IJ9EI/GfD66LZW4D2uwmlnwf+vjmS WakA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ykL73XJe8UBFIAueTr4HVHE7qqZjPYxKixHiODjplgE=; b=Rk4fj/lkwzJnsDcwa7zvgDljVMsp/FFjRsxWAmz6tVa34GBJDELGT+MmORcvwc/z5n yCLzDi252i68VJriQnMaoK5HrEEJ8WGOhfBSBNlHGou5KeOAcTD2PqifG3FsgDYbUNx4 5PqV36zvXX7H0BpvnjcvAkNFafL07kCOBMpecYYbO9o79wZS4LcpW/pMt8Q1sj8trT/s xsqPA2F/iASnCkAqutn6rM9oIWeHmNg5eCjaw+XUl39pnmeU3qoFocZ+fnsRvbSlK5dN qR7NjSgbFTMMsW1LhNL7fqrZZq3CEdgVmZjPi94/LH5hoGsImfgmX1ArJVltSzpMNC1u ZJYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlF6cuk4dvQUJgWbmAg6QbHY8j1BxykloKHgw0u9LZfzlZn1umbM 20yNT6e7vZ+twYNIz/dC1pdZK9jI
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPyY+IJUg26qK/WWCtiEX/Q8YKax9cLFmq2winyK5RRUfcN0j0211giffQ6xeRd2tnyqzM7Waw==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:2bc8:: with SMTP id r191-v6mr705850pfr.164.1533691883924; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 18:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.38.29] (sc-cs-567-laptop.uoa.auckland.ac.nz. [130.216.38.29]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e14-v6sm3448371pff.128.2018.08.07.18.31.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Aug 2018 18:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: RFC4291bis
To: "Manfredi (US), Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <f332beb5-2ee5-c12e-b2b5-d7b1742e4ca0@gmail.com> <3068537452834bab9bc716f4ae775946@XCH15-01-07.nw.nos.boeing.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <40e605c0-932c-db0b-b627-211c2603aced@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 13:31:24 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3068537452834bab9bc716f4ae775946@XCH15-01-07.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/-8gSauvDe2fO5maDih0pyFeKITE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 01:31:27 -0000

On 08/08/2018 12:07, Manfredi (US), Albert E wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
> 
>> NEW:
>    Interface Identifiers for stateless address autoconfiguration
>    are 64 bits long except if the first three bits
>    of the address are 000, or when the addresses are manually
>    configured, or by exceptions defined in standards track documents.
>    The rationale for using 64 bit Interface Identifiers can be found in
>    [RFC7421].  An example of a standards track exception is [RFC6164]
>    that standardises 127 bit prefixes on inter-router point-to-point
>    links. The relationship between prefix length and Interface Identifier
>    length is discussed in [I-D.farmer-6man-exceptions-64].
> 
>       Note: In the case of manual configuration, the Prefix and
>       Interface Identifier can be any length as long as they add up to
>       128. In all cases, routing and forwarding processes must be
>       designed to process prefixes of any length up to /128 [BCP198].
> 
> But I think those exceptions are not SLAAC-related at all. So perhaps:
> 
> NEWNEW
> 
>    Interface Identifiers for stateless address autoconfiguration
>    are 64 bits long. Otherwise, IIDs are normally 64 bits long, except
>    if the first three bits of the address are 000, or when the addresses
>    are manually configured, or by exceptions defined in standards track
>    documents. ... [Rest same as before.]

Thanks, that works for me.

> I'm not sure if there's any reason to mention that these rules only apply to the 2000 prefix.

See my response to Michael's message.

    Brian