Re: HBH Option Header Configuration (draft-hinden-6man-hbh-processing)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 08 June 2021 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DD33A3D4E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 13:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c_PdtSOj7qNw for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 13:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com (mail-pl1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 709843A3D4C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 13:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id o12so7978435plk.8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 13:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B0IQjd/CW3puZjiEBXhArfL7JvcDc7wawdE9tCdo+Aw=; b=HDbJAx0qObMAGmXDWtKO3yUawlOtW97NdtToGbdA4wAKO5viMCjff7WUetphObPwrB jVff5qXHG8UM6igvBYtn2y/95hs8NLqJOLFtCT4AB94ian0ZiT9RUB2C6W+l1ZYYTRPm 75l8Bu/Qel1bKPDVjb3yvOk+I53c3GOviInMVWtTKGZjMj2PV/icpFLtPVj4oYSB+Klk q2/e8D7UWY9xfugtOZIVaAFqkzL/8nlWtHcD+9Fz2ZNJl1UnfbamgFYNMA3QEOCLOACa C7HYS8jriNv2bpGlF2RlWOEi2I1tEoVZQkG7OlTHDh+gi2XPSbzvYd1ia03lU4uCdGan 1/Iw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B0IQjd/CW3puZjiEBXhArfL7JvcDc7wawdE9tCdo+Aw=; b=ajBYb0MW5oTv1cm6hewBcNoaJ5nt1Qe+Crp2p5zQFx8wa03BqNHP/rOARP/XOqMK/j f2srdnoJNH8DP4oku5U1uBLhcaBWcuSwnNxfZkTAMWKFCjcTIQom5l+dLK7uPm80U3Ul kSe5EGnyR9iN+vZmPlW0J/Mc/+Wwb9jlGA/yJFjYXxIyNcb/B2gw93DxnaKjD7qLxv9F JVBs4hnBUSZaX7xbN5XJYNi56YVbD0Fy20COpnSyZOlAvyBQIr+s+6H0ME9tzDEPF1RZ ZoBeiR6re8MvGjIPa1kQiXdVizeSKdhgSTTKAMm+zIBWZgaw/qdnw6jAjwz8Aa+akvJK S57Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531jZbMjxf0sEomLlm7K6DbbXH01DRRsnb+8q2QyUEGBSI8K2OLP 4hVAuw6vWZfh4zSQuyExQxQJvvGLcAZzXw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEPGyIgaYyK7kCUx69GI02PYzF0bk1Yeh2Pkg/Sp0npVdMmrcuaqONN1Dwna/rILDlRjAM/A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e784:b029:f5:6961:f355 with SMTP id cp4-20020a170902e784b02900f56961f355mr1926619plb.9.1623185338655; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 13:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:100d:901:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:100d:901:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m2sm16290437pjf.24.2021.06.08.13.48.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Jun 2021 13:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: HBH Option Header Configuration (draft-hinden-6man-hbh-processing)
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Cc: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <90F1C7DD-A8FF-45C1-9B9F-6E57A04AB88B@gmail.com> <bf5714f9-a580-eaa4-5f5e-c9198505f799@foobar.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4ce55411-5e3b-ccf9-12b1-5652346fb60c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 08:48:52 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <bf5714f9-a580-eaa4-5f5e-c9198505f799@foobar.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/0wiCEEshlfcI9Fr_3uiJQMIv6tc>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 20:49:05 -0000

On 09-Jun-21 08:18, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Bob Hinden wrote on 08/06/2021 21:06:
>> We have discussed this and conclude that yes, we are proposing to
>> require all nodes to examine and process the first HBH Option in the
>> Fast Path.   Not just drop packets with HBH Option Headers.  This
>> change needs to be made clearer in the draft.
> [...]
>> Comments?
> 
> yep - it's 26 years too late to close this particular stable door.

I wouldn't say it exactly like that, but I think the requirement is
totally unrealistic. To be precise:

"However, it
is to be expected that high-performance routers will either ignore it
or assign packets containing it to a slow processing path.  Designers
planning to use a hop-by-hop option need to be aware of this likely
behaviour."

[https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7045.html#section-2.2]

(Standards wonk comment: Since RFC8200 does not obsolete or update
RFC7045, this draft would need to formally update RFC7045 for this
reason. Which I would object to...)

Regards
   Brian

> 
> Nick
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>