Re: MTU handling and 2461bis
Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 29 October 2003 01:31 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA14966 for <ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:31:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AEfBK-0005mL-K1 for ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:31:31 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h9T1VU0A022202 for ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:31:30 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AEfBK-0005m1-CS for ipv6-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:31:30 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA14886 for <ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:31:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AEfBI-0005NX-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:31:28 -0500
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AEfBH-0005NU-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:31:27 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AEfAt-0005bT-8f; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:31:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AEfAI-0005ZK-ID for ipv6@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:30:26 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA14792 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:30:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AEfAG-0005Lg-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:30:24 -0500
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com ([206.197.161.140]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AEfAF-0005Kg-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:30:23 -0500
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach.fuaim.com [206.197.161.141]) by uillean.fuaim.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9T1TrV02246; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:29:53 -0800
Received: from innovationslab.net (md-wmnsmd-cuda2-c6a-a-4.chvlva.adelphia.net [68.65.120.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by clairseach.fuaim.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9T1WdtX003934 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:32:42 -0800
Message-ID: <3F9F17B0.5010808@innovationslab.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:28:16 -0500
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Templin <ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com>
CC: Soliman Hesham <H.Soliman@flarion.com>, "<ipv6@ietf.org>" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: MTU handling and 2461bis
References: <748C6D0A58C0F94CA63C198B6674697A01922E36@ftmail.lab.flarion.com> <3F9F12D2.4070501@iprg.nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F9F12D2.4070501@iprg.nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ipv6-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IP Version 6 Working Group (ipv6) <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Adding MTU negotiations to 2461bis is a non-starter IMHO. The purpose of 2461bis is to clarify issues in the existing 2461, not add new features. Regards, Brian Fred Templin wrote: > Those interested should perhaps have a look at: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iesg-vendor-extensions-01.txt > > before responding to Hesham's question. I am seeing in that > document some language that may place the bar for acceptance > quite high indeed if we were to adopt Hesham's choice # 2. > > Thanks - Fred > ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com > > Soliman Hesham wrote: > >> Folks, >> I've been following this discussion and trying to understand >> where people want to solve it. I'm writing my personal >> conclusion here and please let me know if you disagree. >> >> First there is the question of: is this worth solving? >> and if it is, can it be entirely solved here or do we need to involved >> IEEE? >> There seems to be different opinions here. >> Without getting into the technical issues, which are discussed in >> detail, and assuming that people think it's >> worth solving, we have two choices in terms of moving forward: >> >> 1. Add the MTU negotiation between two nodes in 2461 bis >> 2. Another spec can define those options >> >> The impression I'm getting is that people are in favour of (2) above. >> I'm personally in favour of (2) as well. >> This work seems significant enough to have its own spec. Also, it >> seems like it will take some time to work out >> the details of this optimisation and get concensus >> on the details. >> So can we move forward based on this conclusion >> and not put this in 2461bis ? >> >> Thanks, Hesham >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >> ipv6@ietf.org >> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- MTU handling and 2461bis Soliman Hesham
- Re: MTU handling and 2461bis Fred Templin
- Re: MTU handling and 2461bis Brian Haberman
- Re: MTU handling and 2461bis JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: MTU handling and 2461bis Tim Hartrick