Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6

At 02:19 AM 3/4/2004 +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / 
=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= wrote:
>In the wg meeting on Tuesday, several concerns were raised regarding
>this issue (and the proposed resolution).  To summarize (some of)
>them,
>
>1. the resolution proposes to say "the stateful protocol is DHCPv6"
>    clearly, without leaving other possibilities.  This would require
>    RFC3315 (DHCPv6) to be listed as a normative reference.  However,
>    we'll then face a reference dependency issue, since rfc2462bis is
>    soon expected to be recycled as a DS while RFC3315 is still a PS.
>    (BTW: I could not find a direct source of this dependency issue.
>    Could someone give me a pointer?)

Do you mean that a DS spec cannot have an informative reference to a PS spec?

- Ralph

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------