Re: 6MAN WG Last Call:draft-ietf-6man-reserved-iids-00.txt

sorry, replied to author with typos, but neglected to state my support 
for the draft on the list.  I agree it is a good idea to document and 
advance the idea of a registry.

one substantive comment was that the example of a conflicting IID 
FDFF:FFF:FFF:FFFE should cite the source of the conflicting definition 
(RFC 2526).

Brian Haberman wrote:
> All,
>      This message starts a 3-week 6MAN Working Group Last Call on 
> advancing:
>
>      Title     : Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifiers
>      Author(s) : S. Krishnan
>      Filename  : draft-ietf-6man-reserved-iids-00.txt
>      Pages     : 11
>      Date      : 2008-02-08
>
> as a Proposed Standard.  Substantive comments and statements of 
> support for advancing this document should be directed to the mailing 
> list. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the document editor.  This 
> last call will end on July 10, 2008.
>
> Regards,
> Brian & Bob
> 6MAN co-chairs
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

-- 
Ed Jankiewicz - SRI International
Fort Monmouth Branch Office - IPv6 Research 
Supporting DISA Standards Engineering Branch
732-389-1003 or  ed.jankiewicz@sri.com 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------