IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-linkova-6man-grand-01

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Tue, 26 November 2019 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485361210A9 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:05:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rw2q80XcxdsA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:05:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BE9F1209F4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:05:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863B58A; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:05:33 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:date:date:subject:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-type:message-id:from:from :received:received; s=mail; t=1574787929; bh=oitWczVhJ0JmOawv7vt wjWWGgWJ6gE4YAxuqMAz3TJQ=; b=RxdX/oRNl3B96VvH9ojOpcWaGxzJ66TleKW zaUXvSDq/0Ty/rdSnT7yW5pAZ6tb5vTEShL6Tsi5xOI1Z0ZrybjmAxiVdG+t4KoX kGO//or/POyPwg5eMagNa8RyTlZOA3SE2jo18b+KbMnKQ15nLCAyKXMd8G730dU6 4PPY0+XI=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id fPAAOxFLQvJa; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:05:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:4018:f6b0:d940:4e5f] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:4018:f6b0:d940:4e5f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59FA57A; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:05:29 +0100 (CET)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Message-Id: <C5A10EC6-7AE2-4EDB-8F47-F8FDC550E864@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_61A49D02-D1E7-4119-BB30-7C5E07004490"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.19\))
Subject: Re: draft-linkova-6man-grand-01
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:05:26 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BAQ9F6qmpSerUMTopPe41Lm=+sH_GFEqsj+JTcOrZEWUkg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
References: <CAFU7BAQ9F6qmpSerUMTopPe41Lm=+sH_GFEqsj+JTcOrZEWUkg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.19)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/3PD44ceuPnWI4dIZ6Fc0QQ73ATQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:05:38 -0000

Hi Jen,

> I've submitted -01 version of draft-linkova-6man-grand which was
> presented at 6man session in Singapore.
> The new version is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-linkova-6man-grand/
> The text now explicitly mentions that the Override flag SHOULD be
> cleared for preferred and MUST be cleared for Optimistic addresses.
> Typos fixed, text has been clarified a bit (at leat I hope so).
> 
> Reviews, comments and suggestions would be highly appreciated!

Looks very useful!
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email