Re: rfc2460bis and Frag ID generation

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Thu, 04 February 2016 19:48 UTC

Subject: Re: rfc2460bis and Frag ID generation
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
References: <56B39FB8.4090604@si6networks.com> <6EF1C55C-FE16-4019-A6C9-6AD67DA42E84@gmail.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <56B3A990.9070000@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:42:08 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6EF1C55C-FE16-4019-A6C9-6AD67DA42E84@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/3QxxesW4OYvG_cX--nTOuuAOcvk>
Cc: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Precedence: list

On 02/04/2016 04:24 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
[....]
>> 
>> Thoughts?
> 
> I looked at this earlier and also thought the 32-bit wrap around
> counter text was dated.  I am OK with something similar to what you
> proposed.  My read of the current text is that it is describes the
> 32-bit wrap around counter as an example, as opposed the only way to
> do it, so an update like this would be OK.
> 
> Other comments?

BTW, please let me know if the current version will not be revised in
less than, say, 1 week, and I could do a full review....

Thanks!

Cheers,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

rfc2460bis and Frag ID generation Fernando Gont
Re: rfc2460bis and Frag ID generation Fernando Gont
Re: rfc2460bis and Frag ID generation Bob Hinden
Re: rfc2460bis and Frag ID generation Fernando Gont
Re: rfc2460bis and Frag ID generation Fernando Gont
Re: rfc2460bis and Frag ID generation Bob Hinden
Re: rfc2460bis and Frag ID generation Bob Hinden
Re: rfc2460bis and Frag ID generation Fernando Gont