Re: rfc2460bis and Frag ID generation

[Fernando Gont <[e-mail]>]

On 02/04/2016 05:05 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
> Fernanco,
> 
>> On Feb 4, 2016, at 11:42 AM, Fernando Gont <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/04/2016 04:24 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
>> [....]
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> I looked at this earlier and also thought the 32-bit wrap around
>>> counter text was dated.  I am OK with something similar to what you
>>> proposed.  My read of the current text is that it is describes the
>>> 32-bit wrap around counter as an example, as opposed the only way to
>>> do it, so an update like this would be OK.
>>>
>>> Other comments?
>>
>> BTW, please let me know if the current version will not be revised in
>> less than, say, 1 week, and I could do a full review….
> 
> Not sure, other than this possible change, I don’t have anything else queued up.

I meant... if the I-D is going to be stable for a few days, I can do a
complete review. Otherwise I'd wait for the next rev, so that I review
the updated doc...

Cheers,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: [e-mail]
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492