Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis-06

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Thu, 25 February 2016 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37EC1B30FA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:43:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9vCjvMMO4jNJ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:43:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDBB41B30F8 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:43:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id l127so97683075iof.3 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:43:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=P8U2PyyYvHgHlFOThJIGNkQ1/SUWKoC2n7QnQUC07TU=; b=ExKYwHXoocVI3VElw3MhvMSukFlwpZDna/1FUoPAcnGaNe+cKJQGyXMjtweCT2NnJS B7GW3dKTNP/ly5xKNC62KjY1yCtxpKO2xuFhBQr+3Ml5DNKoCn5yiw7e0k0cVsWaUBes 68jJqXRkk3zNCh5iCLbugVX9XPkZF/OvwLPK1FRTaxZU4d7kAb+xRXGJasFZyzucc7n6 Xe+Z0VPk0IA75yMhtVmdLjk+X1Vxu1jrACfjJoz2cvXlkYWGH/MlApTtXpC9hbF8GD8Y a+x7rYZvzdP4qyHGIBezNttkreGtEZPIbIXIxvIQYvzmdrtjNOQDLiXIhuHMo5qMJXNY qY8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=P8U2PyyYvHgHlFOThJIGNkQ1/SUWKoC2n7QnQUC07TU=; b=EwlnCQB70DXVV72NcIpkgfZee0ekpidJbd/R6+1FI0q2jdC0xgCtxkQmGEUxbq9ciC +IR4sETRiPFGcHG2se8FitM0vdpFIitv4HlZ6wNJUkV1xTNjwG5WFbo4IFv8SgE8EgLQ flPIo7gs2OBreCwV/z1zRkf/6CcrVTpm2orXWCSejF0ft9Yb9f1ukf7q/bAr84n9EeI1 vtWYKPKTGc9ohwLVBdTep3tYu+yPQVBDYf7f74hU/xPrX3AWHQds8TuzNDTfTbTpPIpz xb6SBaSt3MdDNkAgnqATO73nfqOMgPx++ctlRitgO819OBzWMjXSwO1eImH/OW2O4LXY /LkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTOBVqIyCbPuUDEI6fzjAttic73RirgmiTG8czx/L2rhZoMzEo7FHAQzXpZYy1NL4p45Ylgvk1IztbESA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.198.197 with SMTP id w188mr4171946iof.178.1456425826325; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:43:46 -0800 (PST)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.169.35 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:43:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56CCD714.5070403@si6networks.com>
References: <56CCD714.5070403@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:43:46 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7kQ3Y1eJeKQGStRRsGIRxr7rceU
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqcz-LkacRTdU_q2BAFK0q1uN5ZK5YOQAJEf7OBm9zU6MA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis-06
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/4RFEOFzyqsMhDwVYciG5ZOo3FMQ>
Cc: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:43:47 -0000

At Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:03:00 -0300,
Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:

> Below you'll find a detailed review of this document. (I would be great
> if, besides the authors, other folks could comment on the technical
> issues raised below)

Do you have any particular points that you think might need explicit
feedback/comments?  From a very quick read I didn't see anything to
discuss.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya