RE: US patent on an IPv6 geolocation header extension

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Thu, 18 January 2018 19:33 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FAE127011 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:33:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bOGmpbW_dA46 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:33:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phx-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (phx-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net [130.76.184.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C8B912D7F0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:33:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phx-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id w0IJXrNm008237; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:33:54 -0700
Received: from XCH15-01-12.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch15-01-12.nw.nos.boeing.com [137.136.239.188]) by phx-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id w0IJXocU008189 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:33:50 -0700
Received: from XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com (2002:8988:eede::8988:eede) by XCH15-01-12.nw.nos.boeing.com (2002:8988:efbc::8988:efbc) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:33:49 -0800
Received: from XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com ([137.136.238.222]) by XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com ([137.136.238.222]) with mapi id 15.00.1347.000; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:33:49 -0800
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>
CC: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: US patent on an IPv6 geolocation header extension
Thread-Topic: US patent on an IPv6 geolocation header extension
Thread-Index: AQHTkJITY46y5TOWtE2V+0wgtgFnBKN6BK4w
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:33:49 +0000
Message-ID: <6e5ae242d1234b85b5fdd7bed8496717@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1801151335550.1660@ary.qy> <CAO42Z2wvamS0yNpVa9+7jvr+XszQ=1fDW3JNAz-9O=PihhbowQ@mail.gmail.com> <c166dc83c586411993edc382aed8b920@XCH15-01-07.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CALx6S372Da87O=PKnG7Ed1iS9dAWFi_AcF9a_Jwucf1Pq1ZDpw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S372Da87O=PKnG7Ed1iS9dAWFi_AcF9a_Jwucf1Pq1ZDpw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [137.136.248.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/64QssC_o0bd3to5Ahmxb05YVcko>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:33:56 -0000

> Right, my first question would be "How is users' privacy protected?".

One solution is to conceal the geo information via VPN encryption for
transmission over public networks like the Internet. In private networks
such as a corporate enterprise, the geo information could go in the clear.

Fred

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tom Herbert
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 11:25 AM
> To: Manfredi, Albert E <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>
> Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: US patent on an IPv6 geolocation header extension
> 
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Manfredi, Albert E
> <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mark Smith
> >
> >> Here's some prior art from 2013.
> >>
> >> "Enhancing Location Based IP Services"
> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-add-location-to-ipv6-header-01
> >
> > I thought that rang a bell (reminded me of something). Wasn't there some who disliked the idea intensely, just because it disclosed
> geo location without the use being aware as the user might be, if that feature was in an app? I seem to remember some acrimony
> involved.
> 
> Right, my first question would be "How is users' privacy protected?".
> Geo-location of individuals is very sensitive data. In fact, one of
> the goals of ILA is to eliminate the possibility of inferring any
> accurate location of a node from IP addresses.
> 
> Tom
> 
> >
> > Bert
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > ipv6@ietf.org
> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------