Re: IPv6 WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-flags-option-00.txt>
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 22 June 2007 12:43 UTC
Return-path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1iU9-0002S1-86; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:43:33 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1iU7-0002Pk-O6 for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:43:31 -0400
Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.179]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1iU6-0002RN-F5 for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:43:31 -0400
Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id b32so745116ika for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 05:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IZgcS6Umwp/QgMCaW8CuObGsTKoz+vx6axR9xR/Jy65rBPCv8bxmHesarw6+JRO+5XnqHlFDCAV4Co7MVfTCMYg619JSl/qFeCkDdGB2p2dyE1uRUxFkg3yF9uRqDEGghOM5lILMTbtNuImcOkCEhcuhEyyq+Z7EZyqDB6/XCe4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IC3OuRINyBfDua+tZ8mAkaZSgLRRVIRIzlm3sXAk/uAKIXpFB1PIMOozeVm3ngHggNTj6kfp5gRF9KF0Wp9YIKvuklsqrJr5/4YUwKEXn807tAe3uBehIobH9toUPa5qGtLGO8TOQOh5rEd9MzTiSd7GQQW6RTIQipJS9wCLwtQ=
Received: by 10.78.134.12 with SMTP id h12mr1541596hud.1182516209466; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 05:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?10.10.50.1? ( [213.3.13.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h1sm253734nfh.2007.06.22.05.43.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 05:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <467BC3EF.4050107@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:43:27 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bob.hinden@nokia.com
References: <B6BCFDE9-8DFD-420E-B146-C2B80C41BA84@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <B6BCFDE9-8DFD-420E-B146-C2B80C41BA84@nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08e48e05374109708c00c6208b534009
Cc: IPv6 WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-flags-option-00.txt>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Sorry to be slightly late...
I note that 2461bis says that unrecognized options MUST
be ignored. So that means that back-level implementations
will ignore any flag bits sent with this new option. Does
that have any side-effects that should be noted?
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- IPv6 WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-flags-opti… Bob Hinden
- Re: IPv6 WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-flags-… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: IPv6 WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-flags-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IPv6 WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-flags-… Brian Haberman
- Re: IPv6 WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-flags-… Brian E Carpenter