IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-22

"Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com> Mon, 19 August 2019 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ddukes@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D4D120917; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=j34J1InE; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=yXrJ5Lnr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id klchdLo5T-U7; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC226120911; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2472; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1566244930; x=1567454530; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=+htF0MPN/uIrafoa1QWaCQlUpSh0hLIuIjHSGA+n7Wo=; b=j34J1InEgnNi//r38LgyEKbr7z1JKcjRVTgr0WNX20FyRBCNw48ocP+O kgVTWLZqYoJbELntsGkxK7rJ3B03FiEw+LFICoQXEI2YkMaE6sRpigomR eNzUYhf0dn/vMQ/mW2ZHgECAtJ8idI1g9ODYMJ557uveWufVLWrfzHhlC U=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:LLYBuBZUeQERf6X0RFFwrDH/LSx94ef9IxIV55w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el20Q6bRp3VvvRDjeee87vtX2AN+96giDgDa9QNMn1NksAKh0olCc+BB1f8KavmYzE5Ed9qX15+9Hb9Ok9QS47z
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AXAADs/1pd/5ldJa1mGwEBAQEDAQEBBwMBAQGBUwYBAQELAYFEUAOBQiAECyoKhBWDRwOEUoYngjcll2WBLhSBEANUCQEBAQwBAS0CAQGEPwIXgw8jNAkOAgUBAQQBAQECAQYEbYUnDIVKAQEBAQIBEhERDAEBNwEECwIBCBgCAiYCAgIwFRACBA4FFA6DAIFrAw4PAQKgMAKBOIhhc4EygnoBAQWFDBiCFAmBDCgBi2gXgUA/gREnDBOCTD6ELBiDCzKCJo8VnEAJAoIdkESDdRuCMYcwjmOlZQIEAgQFAg4BAQWBUDiBWHAVZQGCQYJCg3KKU3KBKYw2AYEgAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,406,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="310459992"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 19 Aug 2019 20:01:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (xch-aln-008.cisco.com [173.36.7.18]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7JK1ijp003356 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:01:44 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 15:01:43 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 16:01:41 -0400
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 15:01:41 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=mg6N1SwrWBGd7NQdXTj5TZ01MFIELcMnG8NvU4RGwFa6y8MarJhqqzJojj8jG1kPsJWiLSuY8hYOttxFwaYsB/S7qOfpHAfhskUGA4h+eiTe2kEi35Fwc1mwXKXMxgkddA528ElSc/Ew7dmPZ1akhOCem7XK2Ba4T93+mjKv/MZlUBBtLKO8CuAbG8l+dMJQcJWPJQ3xexfdNuiBm/gD5pVKWmJGlXpUpDLxVBZ7jjlZbEAN2RaxmfrG3sNTffGupiZ4cMK6HtzrpMmYK11/L4E9zJSwLY+KOyKWqEU+3XdyiGhnQrwZB8WBwqzzgyAXK3GS0hxG20jE06gFI+/l6w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=+htF0MPN/uIrafoa1QWaCQlUpSh0hLIuIjHSGA+n7Wo=; b=LCpKOwMUEzRQ5AdmG9d5ZhWJzVqe8nLiVK5BtG9swGO+zak6nXN+E84kV6O0dmRUMH78CpJh84vCHuTqdL8MBOd3zyhcMRyGIY8xjiP1EznCSkdKsdvkfqzqlaFG5xSDdRCgLD57cI5Y2hRxVCBfnoutz9lGcbdtFnb1q4DJJttVEQCopkK1GHFd/UvTkwdBRHXOJwU8Fo4dyyNs4dNyXpWTl1tHb9EJg3BPfgnXlciuAL95etxkug+zLfmkUqGqD9x0o8W2TisS8cP8A1H6nZFus74Hwf3+uo/iMcVAXlAlWC4X/Ldd2DFsUERdCr7RsVeaMF+gJtlxLnmv70vtiA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=+htF0MPN/uIrafoa1QWaCQlUpSh0hLIuIjHSGA+n7Wo=; b=yXrJ5LnrjHeG7fkhrOThjcHWv9l46r7i27gmDUj10JhPUzdSFV9/z7ZhPlJawYVOg+P+3hdxwFvEEwdu7ToW3LPJyt0P15/qXmf/a9D6F1dj6KQVb9W1DXvdCAgvWsxPs8u6Ei5ZCo0Ta4e0rMm6DteRyxPcrYuhr9MjHgbGJr8=
Received: from DM6PR11MB3516.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.220.141) by DM6PR11MB4090.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.176.126.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2178.16; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:01:40 +0000
Received: from DM6PR11MB3516.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::94bf:39d4:29cb:42d1]) by DM6PR11MB3516.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::94bf:39d4:29cb:42d1%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2178.018; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:01:40 +0000
From: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>
To: Will LIU <liushucheng@huawei.com>
CC: "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header.all@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-22
Thread-Topic: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-22
Thread-Index: AQHVUnFRrxgOPPy/gEKr2tGTX+oVhacC7PEA
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:01:40 +0000
Message-ID: <A62978D3-8667-4D95-83A8-D052E7ACBFC0@cisco.com>
References: <156576746636.30510.1170913306250014789@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156576746636.30510.1170913306250014789@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ddukes@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.188]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 67fa0f34-17c7-4820-b78f-08d724e00cef
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DM6PR11MB4090;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR11MB4090:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR11MB40904B31A38C525042803499C8A80@DM6PR11MB4090.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 0134AD334F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(53754006)(446003)(11346002)(76116006)(66556008)(25786009)(66446008)(66476007)(66946007)(91956017)(256004)(36756003)(71200400001)(71190400001)(229853002)(186003)(8676002)(2906002)(6486002)(64756008)(486006)(476003)(6116002)(3846002)(2616005)(5660300002)(81166006)(81156014)(6246003)(26005)(316002)(8936002)(33656002)(6512007)(76176011)(14454004)(53936002)(478600001)(305945005)(7736002)(66066001)(6436002)(99286004)(86362001)(4326008)(6916009)(6506007)(53546011)(54906003)(102836004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR11MB4090; H:DM6PR11MB3516.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: vcxiTpoL+LTX5Z420zuKOJ5V14uw6davczN5pgfVhMIlaZsjQWAWLv/TVCWYfCQ2IZiywVuQbE513YtF8dIGoasjgzFf2oM9p3lVDV1KUGNP3UAWPTjciMa2m6xyjNnA6zbJYE3qRwHcz9RAreY9HuezDfiq3fqOqjcQV1pi19r4rpsHY8+Es+TbEL8kocfZyFpc4gP51JIOk6j3NZKqXko66kCZTgH4+QAT5KUC0CBz+5IOMWqpY66dfpMJ+IYgwdwgNwBP9dgjrA6j19B8d++5uT2uMMokUnN7wf/HLUP3MQuqDZ1+UNzycGlUOngZrWlS/4o2GVUOmEcuYsFzQ3s3UT7sQP0cmpk9J5OXMEFdbrY0DUR4rDnUy3dENJTn6dnPdDuiGNfH/zDLN2+o95MAECSwvUv7lRtJLHz6SBE=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CB6596DF8036B84997EFC38B2175EDED@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 67fa0f34-17c7-4820-b78f-08d724e00cef
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Aug 2019 20:01:40.3186 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: npM0p10i8tp+wVtH4s+VWwR+7r7dTsWUCvQpdwK0MJHWlYhvLFaP6iR3GmKCxNPKHTCoZeuynq6t4e4JwREElg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR11MB4090
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.18, xch-aln-008.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Al34yaCVTwoUlO5E4dubn1sIK-0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:02:13 -0000

Thank you for the review Will.  Please see inline.


> On Aug 14, 2019, at 3:24 AM, Will LIU via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Will LIU
> Review result: Ready
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have reviewed draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-22 as part of the
> Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being
> processed by the IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of
> improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not
> addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. 
> Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
> last call comments.
> 
> “Segment Routing can be applied to the IPv6 data plane using a new
>   type of Routing Extension Header called the Segment Routing Header.
>   This document describes the Segment Routing Header and how it is used
>   by Segment Routing capable nodes.”
> 
> My overall view of the document is 'Ready' for publication.
> 
> ** Technical **
> 
> No.
> 
> ** Editorial **
> 
> As noted by author,   section 9 Implementation Status is to be moved removed
> prior to publishing as an RFC. However, it may be still valuable to simplify
> this part and put into appendix as a record.

Good idea, but RFC7942 has some text on this topic.  it says "Since this information is necessarily time dependent, it is inappropriate for inclusion in a published RFC”

However draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status is maintained with deployment and interoperability test results by some of this drafts authors.
I think maintaining that as a separate document will continue to be useful for the community.

Would you agree?

Darren

> 
> Regards,
> Will (Shucheng LIU)
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email