Re: Papers on IPv6 fragmentation

"Vishwas Manral" <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 23 June 2008 06:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipv6-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A2B3A68D2; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33813A68DD for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QtsLuPqDAK6N for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DDD3A68D2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so2128109wfd.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=vBnsTcH/sah7xUSeYM6JzDJPUh9+SNejcxkT0dYWSaY=; b=k/wVLWI34dikAh2+AFt3ey43898EXYy9Guw/zOFXzVMjfbXG8JZeW8aVD3vw58P5/d cPWeEDf/ayQ2c0L7qStCso6bJln2LZb85IJ5esm4NRM/PXmzBU+NDStbx2ykSHQOaaEc SXkzaeiNEJv6KbW+BDytp2AjtVnxL4hX/9d6E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=MYWV9o+M6Jz3XEsuHS5tj+JHi1IzQr+8P3zet+KEmBlB58+cktTOZJvZzoeOvUxr9V LIfsMRSME1xmwg4bS36ksYnY1HbviFPmSNYQyS/0zMxpFr0ujX3VKO4b1NsTq6eZoaze ceG7pW8E8Oy3m7GbBayXAc2qx2TM6AyDeQm3w=
Received: by 10.143.6.1 with SMTP id j1mr3261777wfi.45.1214204054119; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.143.9.18 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <77ead0ec0806222354s347fc275r2e140b28da6e1409@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:54:14 +1000
From: "Vishwas Manral" <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Fernando Gont" <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Subject: Re: Papers on IPv6 fragmentation
In-Reply-To: <200806230637.m5N6br2O019510@venus.xmundo.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200806221050.m5MAoF76005376@venus.xmundo.net> <77ead0ec0806220422v79d8e775n864772131b45b47b@mail.gmail.com> <200806230321.m5N3LP1j004622@venus.xmundo.net> <77ead0ec0806222144o6135b4b3gf57b53659098873@mail.gmail.com> <200806230453.m5N4rLQj008912@venus.xmundo.net> <77ead0ec0806222301i2a94d048vc0a22073baaf456e@mail.gmail.com> <200806230637.m5N6br2O019510@venus.xmundo.net>
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Fernando,

Thanks for your comments on my draft. The RFC number is 4942 I wrongly
tyed it the last time over http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4942.txt.

Thanks,
Vishwas

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>; wrote:
> At 03:01 a.m. 23/06/2008, you wrote:
>
>> RFC4842 - Section 2.1.9.5 has the details you may be looking for. We
>> could certainly add additional details like adding the information in
>> my draft too.
>
> RFC 4842?? ("Synchronous Optical Network/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy
> (SONET/SDH) Circuit Emulation over Packet (CEP)"??)
>
> P.S.: BTW, the high-order bit of my feedback on your draft is that it is
> something worth pursuing... just that I think the draft should clarify those
> two issues I pointed out.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> --
> Fernando Gont
> e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
>
>
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------