[IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh-occurrences-02 (Ends 2026-05-17)
"jordi.palet@consulintel.es" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Wed, 22 April 2026 10:24 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=15726742c1=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ipv6@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipv6@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685F7E0B5634 for <ipv6@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2026 03:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1776853493; bh=CnCLueksTAly1dmlE0y5hVgwUo/Ccj9X8IwqPy8rd/w=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To; b=UZpMhaXt4GovlFWPwclsnCn+2h3O2h8gBfoYoPHByCtKYfyfE2Qwzhfol/oWJKG71 7RERq0PFvHAvnQvXwI3um6KWZLpQuPnpXahfQXMlkBdg2uVSGjb8I4XDDklwoUIC4z BdH4eoutI5YCmzB6/0f7RZqNFwXJ2HCdTHUQPAoM=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TdgDf4dwALo7 for <ipv6@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2026 03:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2741E0B562D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2026 03:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=consulintel.es; s=mailer; t=1776853491; x=1777458291; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=From:Content-Type: Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:Message-Id; bh=XpJ+QIQpzDkHVxI74aJf0ueYgiqTC+HWHfzLLHWmOV4=; b=VDNtNnxccWSCt TA4dUB3scLQcNO21smPQ2sDRTVgTkMQdjl1GhY816jxcu4pk73OdYkH9qEkRNbw8 uCv4BTsKdtN24Rn5mJgL6wA+aSkRALvkSn3jo36ho0Q5VnNtCdf4A5E5dkNMQZOt Hnfjb7FfMnzlUutw3IxCgp4lVM3pJG7k5EJ1vEZLxAzRd48Lh/n4J+eupX0yBofh alo6Ig1/xZtS1uJXWfeyvC2FiikYiqbEQAqT7PzLy8x5M6QUSpYeF0uj3rY6EtFT lqMVaw2VwlXl4n+vkcnEhj/vZfsqsYHkbwL5KhOsBFRZSQozklUeyI/Vo+b1M7jR d7K3Uz0Pw==
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 22 Apr 2026 12:24:51 +0200 (not processed: message from trusted source)
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 22 Apr 2026 12:24:51 +0200
Received: from smtpclient.apple by mail.consulintel.es (10.10.10.5) (MDaemon PRO v25.5.0) with ESMTPSA id md5001002637725.msg; Wed, 22 Apr 2026 12:24:50 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:800b:2278:9864:83fd
X-MDArrival-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 12:24:50 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=15726742c1=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ipv6@ietf.org
From: "jordi.palet@consulintel.es" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F73CBDDB-862B-4E84-B172-817C3EE60C96"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.500.181\))
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 12:24:36 +0200
References: <177684315758.1032515.10043189142937925605@dt-datatracker-b45949c58-5szpr>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <177684315758.1032515.10043189142937925605@dt-datatracker-b45949c58-5szpr>
Message-Id: <8929CC35-DCC4-4F9D-B7C2-20C3560701E2@consulintel.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.500.181)
X-MDCFSigsAdded: consulintel.es
Message-ID-Hash: YYNVMY4N57YKIJURJ5PJ4U5DJ3OZD6AV
X-Message-ID-Hash: YYNVMY4N57YKIJURJ5PJ4U5DJ3OZD6AV
X-MailFrom: prvs=15726742c1=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ipv6.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh-occurrences-02 (Ends 2026-05-17)
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group (6man)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/CPsCDN4smq_QCNovVDwfw6hE1EY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ipv6-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ipv6-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ipv6-leave@ietf.org>
Yes for the adoption. Saludos, Jordi @jordipalet > El 22 abr 2026, a las 9:32, Jen Linkova via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> escribió: > > This message starts a 6man WG Call for Adoption of: > draft-iurman-6man-eh-occurrences-02 > > This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-05-17 > > Abstract: > Operational experience has demonstrated that permitting multiple > occurrences of the same IPv6 Extension Header can create parsing > ambiguity, complicate packet processing, and increase potential > security risks. Although RFC 8200 recommends that senders follow a > specific order of appearance and limit the occurrences of Extension > Headers, receivers cannot assume that these recommendations have been > followed. This document updates RFC 8200 by allowing an IPv6 > destination node, namely a host (i.e., the final destination of an > IPv6 packet) or an intermediate destination node addressed by an > entry in a Routing header list other than the final one, to enforce > strict ordering and limits on the occurrence of Extension Headers. > > Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support adoption > of this Internet-Draft by the 6man WG. Comments to explain your preference > are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message and > include this message in your response. > > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual > Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2]. > Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions > of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. > Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be > found at [3]. > > Thank you. > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iurman-6man-eh-occurrences/ > > There is also an HTMLized version available at: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-iurman-6man-eh-occurrences-02 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-iurman-6man-eh-occurrences-02 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > List Info: https://mailman3.ietf.org/mailman3/lists/ipv6@ietf.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
- [IPv6]Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh-occ… Jen Linkova via Datatracker
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… Brian E Carpenter
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… xiao.min2
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… jordi.palet@consulintel.es
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… Tom Herbert
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… Justin Iurman
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… Tim Chown
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… Justin Iurman
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… Mark Smith
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… Nick Hilliard
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… tom petch
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… tom petch
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… tom petch
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… Jeremy Duncan
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… Justin Iurman
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… Tom Herbert
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… tom petch
- [IPv6]Re: Call for adoption: draft-iurman-6man-eh… Tom Herbert