Re: ICMPv6 question
james woodyatt <jhw@google.com> Fri, 01 September 2017 17:34 UTC
Return-Path: <jhw@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157661343AD for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 10:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UDZMZLu7Tx_O for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 10:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x231.google.com (mail-pg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6860E13432D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 10:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 83so2306336pgb.4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 10:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=kcyoQXOMNkHx75s241B0FSPvN3Az4XMr0IaE5AqcUbQ=; b=e8jqO+AkyFaZZbagTT8vBjjeJplXCKfZSxLsffqa5V1yG+m9izktOf6upS4BlukY1F 1KvHBPMwi+Lla5RGIImUsz77I8XHhU1ElbjsRym104QvBYW1YZGUav6CqH1Xtsk/4lN8 WAPlg6nPHy1PgHTS0cYYvA793BhWxVDR+TokvIb3KTmQSWKavV1+0txH947Q4mvAgBeW YMhNeWIPA9dhFc11hadLsp2S4WQRQQ6G32wI9hu6rq7f5fDpycAu4OqIfjlXoGi7v4Qk 9a4FdkNcyA3zCsiRuthcyh7xLgJcVAS2KHkrUbC17xhyvGB+VYD91ZBKHKywPztVddcE FoMQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=kcyoQXOMNkHx75s241B0FSPvN3Az4XMr0IaE5AqcUbQ=; b=LLyr1OBcnrHPoVa8YPPt5cc7Sp8HaYHh468gB3u5htR0G0LzIobXrnRHx5xGOzE1Ze GGup6UxBHrgsQd664dQ3CR6iSjlr9xT2JmWQiGv0Zysjf8uT8Hws+GUtBj8KilYZvlyM WX8L1O3+6YPMl5Emk9BGhn536FaqOA+1N76h9sttdswvzN5oY4aKq17urk4rlTqJGJSh bGqk6UC6KMIFmpSCUKaKz39mxENNlwIpkXCJRoTjjm52WCahcE/610Z6CA5zDu4FJEPR apEtSAX34ojPSBbrJl1HpxDjpezpNz3lRB1vPqadY2e1rsgsSpB83BKAaTExYCh5uTfg muMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhy+0oPqUSjv5tnMtONketXEwiWl7s1fcJA5dNvv76hIMPJDAPE stmNzSf7OtP0dF6i
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7DtoGGYTSq1X6SZcIk0hZ0WDlHfgAq6VQK1Lqde7jrrnw6vawC2EVIFKrxmVA2gveH2Vztzw==
X-Received: by 10.98.79.14 with SMTP id d14mr3136993pfb.92.1504287246866; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 10:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620::10e7:10:447c:38ff:1448:a94e? ([2620:0:10e7:10:447c:38ff:1448:a94e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p13sm1401110pgs.9.2017.09.01.10.34.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Sep 2017 10:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Message-Id: <6163BB50-8822-4C10-A48D-7030BD3BD67E@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_44C9E48A-9662-441E-AB21-B1A5934C611D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: ICMPv6 question
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 10:34:05 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2xYD-aQAQjFFFh2=iqF42izQw30NnTLPWAvpivFBGPkpg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <952aab1a2c824a79b98a3f9d2b3a473a@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAO42Z2xYD-aQAQjFFFh2=iqF42izQw30NnTLPWAvpivFBGPkpg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/CnIiyumIdx9g7ikTBjjuao7eAb8>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 17:34:09 -0000
On Aug 31, 2017, at 17:26, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was wondering about how this could happen and I think there could be two possible causes, > > - incorrect ND cache entry for 2001:db8::baa2001:db8::baa […] > - host attached to one end of a point-to-point link […] A third case, which isn’t an error or failure mode: - transmitter is not yet unaware that receiver has transitioned from router to host. --james woodyatt <jhw@google.com <mailto:jhw@google.com>>
- ICMPv6 question Templin, Fred L
- RE: ICMPv6 question Manfredi, Albert E
- RE: ICMPv6 question Templin, Fred L
- RE: ICMPv6 question Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: ICMPv6 question Mark Smith
- Re: ICMPv6 question Brian E Carpenter
- RE: ICMPv6 question Templin, Fred L
- Re: ICMPv6 question Alexandre Petrescu
- RE: ICMPv6 question Templin, Fred L
- Re: ICMPv6 question james woodyatt
- Re: ICMPv6 question Mark Andrews