Results of my detailed review of draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-11
Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Tue, 24 May 2016 22:26 UTC
Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD6512D1DA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 15:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZSdkLItFf43U for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 15:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com (mail-vk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 839F812D175 for <6man@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 15:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id r140so41376052vkf.0 for <6man@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 15:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=GY8nGMcwdVzc9i++Hd3vP8Z42SC2G30RP9816epBiZU=; b=kqSuHsyNAbiDt5rPYfqnjhhrTS3vbTo3klm3OFAbzLZeqWLEv5WoKVke0sxsD3t/DY p7OjihCGuX7qObioi5ekjA9OQpeoEfvXY/Tiri/U8ic6WiMXEncNgIseHQn/Kalu4oXc Q9qF3z3kBL0LbEAmx2pxzZMoLTXl0H3c0PZ1Y6tX/p3czoVPlNKOggO23SvxpSrLOvyM QBGX1zZjFLNb3J9kfblRtorgxxWHsRohVGZTa3hQwi/VgaIrNhrujdhjbk3UHF9qWhKs 41qymFMYAexRyCNRQMx1VrXMDqdEuEiVGytnshLkIyMDZaJlnWC32jbI9gv8q9bETPZj xZZQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=GY8nGMcwdVzc9i++Hd3vP8Z42SC2G30RP9816epBiZU=; b=NRckPqXU96w/s0lhf2OsI2VhimPUX7MF4sHwGABbD4EOkiIP0shpJbxC77b9OkIVpg ew9oWKFeiLCpHh5/dClRfo5pXYid7W7vDAcVqzDjbd8mprZLjkl+ZVTdCPqVy+voSGdH GkJtSxl79xTxFYa++SwJyOUj7KY6EfQuOCx+87MPtFKbB0rt1fZc4mHFrMZPq8RCzuvk WFvwRajvOInjstDHXSQu9mKDS776TnK3mdnXpDXUdtENcOC94UTdmxWNOcBHIqexm//4 11QW0a1XqSKm9X9lWKs+L7yMDH2eHChZKo3FJJPKjwTSduh2sMDkrW9UQHDCF7ZuhMhT rEQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tK1EPKbfl+JFwFQsYHEYmkiEYB+YIcczlXJ9sIHrXcAFJFBUotg9Zm/Pv2g64yu9OEgvPE5exlW9gZ1Sw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.176.2.151 with SMTP id 23mr297876uah.106.1464128780589; Tue, 24 May 2016 15:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.176.3.168 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 15:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.176.3.168 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 15:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2xwcaU+KyZ-W1+GJzQyvY4Bvax=uiP48WEsesu-ufhscg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO42Z2ypgRfFxWhmeq0WLg_n=ufA5c5mROJjsC-z2766_4242g@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wqwm4zXe5QKQqAP7DPP=-kxUL5ceuDhSKndBPHM+DVFQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2y6aSLDRHHDmRK58rJ2RwFaTazscTkVC1YVT5xd7mUB6w@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2x=ARtxrznFERZA__APnwSkYk6NE_z-YknkWPEkh1Vovg@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2zk3ZX2bGYT3G9_TCgeQMbsx2GJQ7TdgSBKZFL60xV2DA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2z5KYUg8N7ptZ6ga2H3SoZRMCRdOfP1Q4s8Ay9PmaSHzw@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2yQnN_6D-f9xTde2WgJzGP=mkEo-PPHjnXN6h6FL_ud7w@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2yFVDriOn9uAHzNgkFLjQf_2Qs0FHNPQcbj2k70C5ztDg@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2yWPCz438H8b8CcACptciU80etn8w6m2POX8H6tVR9xRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2y4_BVBLHxmRwtg2c7F3gjqE=mV3pn4ZYFByfxTp2HiRw@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2zCx1ZCFqyDmt64LvX9YV_1aAd4q=CyTEGq13b+gFm06Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xS_6z_0HvYotM2mCd=RSMNqUv_dC91LiCO8VVPYE9_yQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2y2xJ2k_ig5xBRxfiUrag-9mXhdxpS7gw-2fXuCMicAZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wK-TUPc_BDoimivE_hKNrSiUOQDWtu0b6YtMCUZCGHBA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2y258yrf37eHeg7f4Y==Wzg_q5onizLRPf40RaZef4fJw@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2y3KCi00SsqM63U0vigDNk-RxOhpWAeXGBuazzaeu+szw@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2w0o6kbECBfRD5MSH36Cc-s8CzbAgKi8HLxuQj8GLYCdw@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2yV+HG7r3oLiRF5-azjY3UwBAkFyYK2Sr2cRQY0L3Qf0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xRcCmxGztKzpXcs+_QMb=nipijJ=y+rOhAg1_29zT11g@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xEC5+yVjw8xFh9axvt5djyj3XXuU-_-dBCaUJCMwOjdQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2zKhwrnCte_15M7D2fvP-bo9fkZjX3skPNN=XEOg58exA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xLxPeAS67gcJiRQU7=mH9cpV=2n3FuXkkzqhCV=1z71A@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xZzfuwY7HR1qu3T12yrHr3idqEo_KmY0sW6R1i48RvRA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xwcaU+KyZ-W1+GJzQyvY4Bvax=uiP48WEsesu-ufhscg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 08:26:20 +1000
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2zf+S-BchXTcwUh8VYu5orFmLzN5CBSCcfE3eoG5wxG5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Results of my detailed review of draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-11
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
To: 6man@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d0fc8df5fc005339e0bb9"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/D4hwJKbaSl50FvFSv3fraXtMwHg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 22:26:22 -0000
Hi, So I said I'd do a detailed review of it. I haven't done it yet however, because going by the recent discussions, I now don't think it is close enough to its final form or working group acceptance to be worth the time I'd spend unfortunately. Regards, Mark.