Re: END SID Without SRH
Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Fri, 14 June 2019 11:06 UTC
Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3931201CF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L-ql1Lg3iYA9 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bugle.employees.org (accordion.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C50A120077 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from astfgl.hanazo.no (unknown [173.38.220.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bugle.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67AA9FECBED4; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:06:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by astfgl.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82081175F173; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:06:50 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: END SID Without SRH
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2zhm_XHdt6sK23KTukOn0o2rx7O5_16C_GQ-FTwe6FJjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:06:49 +0200
Cc: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <85721702-258A-4591-ADB2-109B41A3F15F@employees.org>
References: <BYAPR05MB42456C75487CF9283A0ED1D0AE100@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAO42Z2y_D-xe+tX9n-KQYjnk5bkYXibO0Zs3E=JfAWWMZnJcSA@mail.gmail.com> <3030A68F-6CE1-4179-930C-D60BEB73063A@employees.org> <CAO42Z2yLkCRNXKp8KKnqh8VRRo6p1dx4h0-gyLBFZ=Jq0xQj2w@mail.gmail.com> <0C40BEFF-B050-40A1-BCB7-F76ADF18E3E0@employees.org> <BYAPR05MB42457C37AE7DC3F4CACC8FD7AEEC0@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <B254E985-A848-4FC4-868D-E2F04CF7E0DB@cisco.com> <104B106B-8130-4931-9DBF-2FE5C5633CB0@gmail.com> <B0D2092F-CC6E-4990-857B-E88229FA80AF@cisco.com> <277E6E14-8FD4-45A3-9350-E30B82C0FA86@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau1MDKpFrmmDFpj3s4cZYwFyB0KnWMrc-yjw_m5mO_8REw@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wgZ8gE1pTDy2xbxetdLqf8EWpKRmbi=n7qfgEALwVmVQ@mail.gmail.com> <BBB1A2A3-DE78-4E97-B193-9B6980B82358@employees.org> <CAO42Z2zhm_XHdt6sK23KTukOn0o2rx7O5_16C_GQ-FTwe6FJjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/EmvXkglnwq25PgNxm4lED9u6cWY>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:06:56 -0000
Mark, > The ambiguity and I think non-compliance with RFC 8200 is when > dropping isn't occurring, and how to process the packet is singularly > encoded in the DA address. This is instead of following what is > explicitly encoded in the following EHs and transport layer headers. > This is contrary to IPv6 host processing of DA match -> EH processing > -> Transport layer -> Application Layer packet processing. OK, then I don't understand. Would you mind spoon feeding me. How is SRH processing different? Best regards, Ole
- END SID Without SRH Ron Bonica
- RE: END SID Without SRH Ron Bonica
- Re: END SID Without SRH Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: END SID Without SRH Tom Herbert
- RE: END SID Without SRH Ron Bonica
- Re: END SID Without SRH Mark Smith
- RE: END SID Without SRH Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
- Re: END SID Without SRH Ole Troan
- Re: END SID Without SRH Mark Smith
- Re: END SID Without SRH Ole Troan
- RE: END SID Without SRH Ron Bonica
- Re: END SID Without SRH Tom Herbert
- RE: END SID Without SRH Ron Bonica
- Re: END SID Without SRH Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: END SID Without SRH Bob Hinden
- Re: END SID Without SRH Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: END SID Without SRH Bob Hinden
- Re: END SID Without SRH Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: END SID Without SRH Mark Smith
- Re: END SID Without SRH Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: END SID Without SRH Tom Herbert
- Re: END SID Without SRH Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: END SID Without SRH David Farmer
- Re: END SID Without SRH Tom Herbert
- Re: END SID Without SRH Mark Smith
- Re: END SID Without SRH Mark Smith
- Re: END SID Without SRH Mark Smith
- Re: END SID Without SRH Ole Troan
- Re: END SID Without SRH Mark Smith
- Re: END SID Without SRH Ole Troan
- Re: END SID Without SRH Mark Smith
- Re: END SID Without SRH Tom Herbert
- Re: END SID Without SRH Ole Troan
- Re: END SID Without SRH Gyan Mishra