IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN cross-wg review: draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-01

Karsten Thomann <karsten_thomann@linfre.de> Mon, 12 January 2015 11:52 UTC

Return-Path: <karsten_thomann@linfre.de>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1D71A8BC2; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:52:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.338
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.338 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTp4fhnNPrxu; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:52:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from linfre.de (linfre.de [83.151.26.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9B771A7003; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:52:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from linne.localnet (178.142.123.166) by linfreserv.linfre (Axigen) with (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 10920C; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:52:31 +0100
From: Karsten Thomann <karsten_thomann@linfre.de>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 6MAN cross-wg review: draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-01
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:52:31 +0100
Message-ID: <1816705.A9t7GNQOdE@linne>
User-Agent: KMail/4.10.4 (Windows/6.1; KDE/4.10.4; i686; ; )
In-Reply-To: <232077E7-7135-41E8-B0DB-C786F8C410CA@employees.org>
References: <232077E7-7135-41E8-B0DB-C786F8C410CA@employees.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="nextPart4123148.1RlpNb6qs0"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AXIGEN-DK-Result: No records
DomainKey-Status: no signature
X-AxigenSpam-Level: 6
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/FG-y0KSYvfoIOvGl68nA2qYAk58>
Cc: l2tpext@ietf.org, l2tpext-chairs@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:52:45 -0000

As Jinmai already wrote, I can volunteer, but only under the same constrains, as I have no prior 
experience with reviews.

Some comments:
I know it is also written in RFC4719, but why was "or" used at "Ethernet frame, without the 
preamble or frame check sequence (FCS)".
At the payload section is "and" used...
"As noted above preamble and FCS are stripped before encapsulation."

As already written by Jinmai, the hop limit is with 255 as a default setting a bit high, a default of 
64 should be high enough for nearly all cases.

Kind regards
Karsten

Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 12:14:14 schrieb Ole Troan:
> Hi,
> 
> The chairs of l2tpext have asked for a 6man review of:
> 
> Title: Keyed IPv6 Tunnel
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-01
> 
> Can we get a couple of volunteers please? As well as any other comments to
> the lists are welcome of course. Please keep l2tpext@ietf.org in CC.
> 
> Best regards,
> Ole
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email