Re: I-D Action: draft-linkova-6man-default-addr-selection-update-00.txt

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Fri, 07 April 2017 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF52127F0E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 07:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OMDNJ--H61tR for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 07:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 475CB12773A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 07:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id l7so50636354ioe.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 07:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9Y7TVAnXpkGlWEbgPMqBjYq6A5mN76/Txbkg5ekQEwg=; b=hTvS/8PTvyT38XplyZXXin7BFBBibSYobfuuD4TYzm7SZQSGoW3G8YSIxGFiFir9At 1NdVwteQvIw3z4u46gJu9Koc0d9IqMdASTN+Ot2P8Hiiwe4nlEZRdhzxnRI4sQOPPtDt wo7XCoMpNiL2zXlkxBIFzN7AXfFdbEdjGzTbtlTWjwrs5X7qT4B13+89nSVTnRGwT/3c kVSC3OwK/LBKZJ2oNUzyTIqx5anxG8FC6MmqCoBK3uhd/rnyQo4oLNtW0RywnjZoa+Yn hfI0F8kZ16ZxSGUCXnlOjLVsUuirif+Si2mUx4VFayPzo1Hyddxv+fIBenM3xa1ABekn HQWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9Y7TVAnXpkGlWEbgPMqBjYq6A5mN76/Txbkg5ekQEwg=; b=WTnt9GcUf56KPPK2TyaUTQpT+DZ5cpz/jbQghpN5cHdhQkuuodwFyHrBXsFywNP/tr 1TnJxqNklES0grEVyKSFXRF6aH8LNJNKPDkSIOK5e8hr0J32PAGGofyq5lIsgEDNkLww JE4yFNVRIE5+aBrTXu5ygZd6xxst7/WyQaJE7JshfOPWfAvjRyIJ/57gOOAPe4VVrnVa uwGZeTcD01M3RDZAbQuR5QOn18v5fYFZUVBn7Pb5Nvwy8JX5slAn6KYF6OWtTN6rk8wz MNIGLPBSf5fK7/CgYXcrG2rJaCwEKrJld2YvYeyZo+6g/ZqEN9Pp9XFelc1WMmOEPP4b oVUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7OFUrbLCYyHrxklNkAO36IZMAiWFaRfSay0buQbVsMfV5yrGr+Zu0j/eU4fQ9A2JpyxscxfjllxQ2ppw==
X-Received: by 10.107.18.5 with SMTP id a5mr5084573ioj.189.1491576362685; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 07:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.184.197 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 07:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <696ab419-ed78-7a52-94be-96ea1e2d3e58@gmail.com>
References: <149093611351.8864.5121956820429281359@ietfa.amsl.com> <1f8d497b-3286-2074-7c2e-f224ceda55a8@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wREkid1tCNCQz9HriFC_xD9K=WB=vS4UO3oEHMSfsN7g@mail.gmail.com> <CAFU7BAR1ZJBnu=+pjNGYD37YghXhYRTJAUpcSd=XvtJY=4k4UA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAedzxrqbcoVu0YMnEz=uNNqnuAnD=ToBU9P_3K41KdWBWqGKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFU7BARyPiPncGtidixP2A248X_2mS04cJrfW3TAyV8txKHAsw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAedzxq4ObCLgeizkcmXRNUVJF_2Mv5xWy_5G=YGws15fC-_Og@mail.gmail.com> <696ab419-ed78-7a52-94be-96ea1e2d3e58@gmail.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 16:45:42 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFU7BATBwAEs5sjy5+nqauB3vW=87w_3MJ83ZemDu6P+SVs2Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-linkova-6man-default-addr-selection-update-00.txt
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/G0khu6gJoizHQYILmyVI29Tvd30>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 14:46:05 -0000

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> But Jen is correct, we also have to consider reality with clashing
> addresses.
>
> Doesn't that mean that "when the host moves from one network segment
> to another" we should suggest that the stack *deletes* all state
> learned from that network interface? (And yes, that breaks RFC6059.)

Well...I do not know the right answer...In some scenarios it does make
sense (for example I'd prefer my laptop and my desktop
to do that), while for mobile devices it might not be the best way to
operate (why DNA was created in the first place?).
Maybe DNA assumptions need to be changed to 'the combination of the
link-layer address, the link-local IPv6 address and the list of PIOs
is unique across links'?

-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry