Re: rfc2462bis -- loopback suppression

Michael Hunter <Michael.Hunter@Sun.COM> Thu, 12 February 2004 20:28 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA12944 for <ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:28:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArNRj-0006Ty-B9 for ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:28:27 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1CKSRjH024912 for ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:28:27 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArNRj-0006Tj-6E for ipv6-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:28:27 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA12938 for <ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:28:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArNRg-0007l2-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:28:24 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ArNQp-0007gI-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:27:32 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArNQO-0007b2-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:27:04 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArNQL-0005qJ-Pw; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:27:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArNCL-00019n-Uc for ipv6@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:12:33 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA11443 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:12:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArNCI-00061H-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:12:30 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ArNBO-0005vu-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:11:35 -0500
Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArNB1-0005q5-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:11:12 -0500
Received: from esunmail ([129.147.156.34]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i1CKBCVo013493 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:11:12 -0700 (MST)
Received: from xpa-fe1 (esunmail [129.147.156.34]) by edgemail1.Central.Sun.COM (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HSZ0006OMQNJ9@edgemail1.Central.Sun.COM> for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:11:12 -0700 (MST)
Received: from laphroig ([129.146.85.171]) by mail.sun.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with SMTP id <0HSZ00EB3MQMDR@mail.sun.net> for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:11:11 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:09:40 -0800
From: Michael Hunter <Michael.Hunter@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: rfc2462bis -- loopback suppression
In-reply-to: <y7vfzdg4zyi.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
To: JINMEI Tatuya / ¿ÀÌÀãºÈ <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
Cc: ot@cisco.com, ipv6@ietf.org
Message-id: <20040212120940.0a67e23b.michael.hunter@eng.sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-sun-solaris2.10)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
References: <y7v65ef1544.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> <7t5d68lkvn8.fsf@mrwint.cisco.com> <y7vfzdg4zyi.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: ipv6-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IP Version 6 Working Group (ipv6) <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:41:09 +0900
JINMEI Tatuya / ¿ÀÌÀãºÈ <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> wrote:

> >>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 00:07:39 +0000, 
> >>>>> Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com> said:
> 
> > one solution could be to add a optional identifier option to DAD NS
> > packets, so that the sender can recognise the case when its own
> > packets are looped around.
> 
> > too big a change for 2462bis?
> 
> I think this is too big to merge into 2462bis (sorry), but I agree
> this is worth considering as an extension in a separate document
> (depending on how this is popular and severe).

This essentially the problem with DAD on wifi, right?  That should
make a general solution more interesting then just a corner case.

			mph

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------