Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA
Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Tue, 08 December 2020 16:22 UTC
Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6AA3A11C3 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:22:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OVipHTwnAMtB for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:22:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BDC33A109E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:21:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com with SMTP id w139so8393368ybe.4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 08:21:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=xLGfhh7H6tG3UC0lmqjg88WTdT6lYFYw8YUpoeo92ig=; b=hOGbjMoGQLWf9/hxBqYhLPg60inRCz29J+vOAxJzQaauF8smUpLB67KjE1/9JqaXqc Oe3/d9/aw4RtbWkBrRoFBq26NKv7e617fn0X6vU6p/V5KANixZxU7UW5oggRBYQuPxF1 L6Yi85j284VYU9SkF9/l6YiTHW80/9mh7Ln6u9i6T4rOUMNade184jANaWZeq1mJktzQ 1xgpeli/57spqW/zAKHiTt+VKx9kQKprvZ8rU4FP35wNiq0eDfj548n0LYuuJvdkAyIP YYhq6jogPvDoMvQF0jQHnJb+E0vdH3xsxsYRIRCajbg3YjgMJAH9o2ooIGyaaa+GoAVT oEyA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xLGfhh7H6tG3UC0lmqjg88WTdT6lYFYw8YUpoeo92ig=; b=FcS5tD3lB5qZgpaacMKWG32l/272NdV85hiEsbMos0LGOQDdyc9D17oyW2aApNNWnM gAgFhPeay6dYkjfYP8zYlZZb3T0eQT8Jpk5ivbE7fMDeNitYAQw0jLptJD5EnzG8pw+2 GY6SsXqPoyfSPcKmaPhcH6CFCsRyOWVzMe3qJp8hCQdgNEg6caOW23AHr7q2MdH/cSc5 iIizYUhXlDZEfaIjDslmETK85DABCD6Uxj015346IW+vCAbl9x6e5zUB57UcsRZ/OZjt 0U8QPNNCQ0N44net/chUPFnbmxmVgmyMkYo5eF77pjFZz2Kgw76MgmgPRzu42TiFwd3o SAvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mrfcT0/uvTv0cqm05TzTIRBv2aLZeOq4M4N6rX1Gy9KHWd9I2 iTN67bLJGZDEWZ5k7GsFLtnnTmMkHosOqfjhifSRBxC/si4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwH23PGcPhv+/3U3+8dqD4JhrZt+hc8+b0maIcHBLk0LTKKNc+bjwVnXHaH4Betn+lo2cp2psXcNaq2U27krVI=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:4258:: with SMTP id p85mr7655904yba.423.1607444505429; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 08:21:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <c0676b3391344afd96b9e9c7db74a140@boeing.com> <1489fb244a234ebbac816383c1cc5dfd@boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <1489fb244a234ebbac816383c1cc5dfd@boeing.com>
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:21:33 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcd8zp85cgtpLphjYsHE5sZ34X-v4q0=GVdmsT2dhZn4hA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA
To: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000be09c605b5f65627"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Htul9PHgjkFsh4YKsgTRTuEw4YE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:22:30 -0000
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 5:09 PM Templin (US), Fred L < Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote: > Behcet, I did go ahead and nudge the draft again to pick up on your points > and > > to incorporate a richer Prefix Delegation service which others have been > asking > > about. Not a complete reboot as you were suggesting, but hopefully enough > > to satisfy most readers: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-6man-omni-interface/ > > > Sure. Thanks Fred, this is more workable for me. Behcet > Thanks - Fred > > > > *From:* ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Templin (US), > Fred L > *Sent:* Thursday, December 03, 2020 8:58 AM > *To:* sarikaya@ieee.org > *Cc:* ipv6@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA > > > > Behcet, thanks for the suggestion but I like the drafts we already have > and I think an > > engaged reader would come to like them as well. A reboot at this phase is > not going > > to happen. > > > > Fred > > > > *From:* Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2012@gmail.com > <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>] > *Sent:* Thursday, December 03, 2020 8:04 AM > *To:* Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> > *Cc:* ipv6@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA > > > > This message was sent from outside of Boeing. Please do not click links or > open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know that the content > is safe. > > > > > Hi Fred, > > > > What I am observing from the ensuing discussion is that you should > consider a reboot of OMNI seriously. I suggest you reorg your drafts, add > an architecture draft and start from scratch with -00 drafts. > > This could be good time to start that process. > > > > Behcet > > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 10:40 AM Templin (US), Fred L < > Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion, Behcet. In terms of architecture, at its most > fundamental > > level it is simply just the marriage of ISATAP and Teredo. (Well, there is > a lot more to > > it than just that, but everything builds on top of those principles.) > > > > Fred > > > > *From:* Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2012@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 02, 2020 8:10 AM > *To:* Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> > *Cc:* sarikaya@ieee.org; ipv6@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 12:44 PM Templin (US), Fred L < > Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote: > > Behcet, > > > > To be clear, there is now a -52 version of the draft that bows to the > pressures > > of those who still insist on the /64 boundary. Earlier draft versions can > still be > > referenced for those who like /65+, but there is strong resistance to > using the > > 54 “zero” bits of fe80::/10 which is where the extra prefix bits would end > up > > going. I was told that trying to define a use for those bits would be > pushing a > > “large rock up a hill”, and I have experienced that struggle firsthand. > > > > To your comments, yes an EUN should certainly be added to figure 2 and > > adding a packet flow diagram is something that can be done as well. I can’t > > give a timeframe for a next draft version but will put this in a TODO note > > to myself. > > > > > > Sure. As I mentioned you could consider separating some parts of this > quite large document into an architecture document and protocol document. > > > > Behcet > > > > Behcet > > Thanks - Fred > > > > *From:* Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2012@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 01, 2020 10:17 AM > *To:* Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> > *Cc:* ipv6@ietf.org > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA > > > > Hi Fred, > > > > In draft-templin-6man-omni-interface-51 > > > > I could not see EUN in Figure 2. > > Also a figure showing the flow of packets in the network from source to > destination is missing. > > > > Maybe you need an architecture draft to clear these things out. > > > > Behcet > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:12 PM Templin (US), Fred L < > Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote: > > Folks, this is a big decision point for the AERO/OMNI drafts but I am > preparing > to drop support for SEND/CGA (RFC3971; RFC3972). This means that IPv6 ND > message authentication on OMNI interfaces will use a simple HMAC the same > as is done for Teredo (RFC4380; RFC6081). If anyone knows why that might > cause problems, it would be best to speak up now. > > Fred > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >
- AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA Templin (US), Fred L
- RE: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- RE: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA Vasilenko Eduard
- RE: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA Behcet Sarikaya
- RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for… Behcet Sarikaya
- RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA Alexandre Petrescu
- RE: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA Vasilenko Eduard
- RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA Templin (US), Fred L
- RE: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: AERO/OMNI dropping support for SEND/CGA Behcet Sarikaya