Re: RH0 Security Considerations/Discussion

I think we had some material in the v6ops security overview
draft:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-security-overview-06#section-2.1.1 

but not in too much depth.

Jari

Christopher Morrow kirjoitti:
> Is there an existing RFC/Draft discussion of RH0 pitfalls and
> solutions to those pitfalls that discussses more than just the
> host-based problems? Pekka has:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-savola-ipv6-rtheader-00.txt
>
> which looks like it's mostly host-based. There doesn't look like there
> is a document to address the network side of this problem, yet. Would
> that be useful? Would it be useful to add that to Pekka's draft? or a
> separate draft? Is this WG the proper place for that? Pekka's draft is
> a v6wg, this looks like a complement to that.
>
> I think a document like this would be useful as an educational
> document for the case where RH0 is deprecated in the spec but not
> available in all devices (such as in a transition or in
> legacy/embedded devices). l think even if RH0 isn't deprecated this
> would be useful educational material.
>
> -Chris
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>   

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------