RE: registering tunnel types

[<[e-mail]>]

Re-,

Please check https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-6 for your questions. 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : ipv6 [mailto:[e-mail]] De la part de Alexandre Petrescu
> Envoyé : jeudi 25 octobre 2018 09:58
> À : [e-mail]
> Objet : Re: registering tunnel types
> 
> why do you say 'sixtofour' and not '6to4'?  If that is a YANG software
> problem then it should be fixed.  If it is just a nicer manner to write
> text then I think it is a little bit confusing to me.
> 
> (there are similar problems with xml2rfc which cant reference '3gpp'
> documents because starting with a number;  I guess fixing one would help
> fix the other).
> 
> Alex
> 
> Le 25/10/2018 à 09:53, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit :
> > Are:
> > -IPv6 in UDPv4 and
> > -IPv6 in IPv6 as used by openvpn;
> >
> > covered by the list below?
> >
> > These are a few tunnelling mechanisms I use routinely.
> >
> > Existing identity 6tofour should be deprecated, if that means 6to4,
> > which is deprecated.
> >
> > Existing identity iphttps has a version number for IP?
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > Le 24/10/2018 à 17:57, tom petch a écrit :
> >> draft-ietf-softwire-yang
> >> completed IETF Last Call two weeks ago and, since then, has acquired a
> >> YANG module that defines tunnel types, as listed below.  It is intended
> >> to be a IANA-maintained module and so changes to the list of tunnels
> >> will not require a reissue of the softwires RFC-to-be.  At the same
> >> time, getting it right first time never did any harm so if anyone can
> >> think of any missing, or can think of other places where there might be
> >> other tunnels lurking, now would be a good time to mention it.
> >>
> >> It is based on RFC4087 Tunnel MIB (which created an SMI Textual
> >> Convention that went up to Teredo) so tunnels from that vintage are
> >> likely well catered for.  softwires is not where I would have first
> >> looked for tunnel types, but it has a certain logic to it.
> >>
> >>       identity  other
> >>
> >>       identity direct
> >>
> >>       identity gre
> >>
> >>       identity minimal
> >>
> >>       identity l2tp
> >>
> >>       identity pptp
> >>
> >>       identity l2f
> >>
> >>       identity udp
> >>
> >>       identity atmp
> >>
> >>       identity msdp
> >>
> >>       identity sixtofour
> >>
> >>       identity sixoverfour
> >>
> >>       identity isatap
> >>
> >>       identity teredo
> >>
> >>       identity iphttps
> >>
> >>       identity softwiremesh
> >>
> >>       identity dslite
> >>
> >>       identity  aplusp
> >>
> >> Tom Petch
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> >> [e-mail]
> >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [e-mail]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------