RE: Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Tue, 07 April 2015 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EBF1B3C12; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 13:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IoxrXzMW-WwU; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 13:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0112.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 951FF1B3C11; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 13:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.146) by CO1PR05MB443.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.130.23; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 20:26:07 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.13.220]) by CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.13.220]) with mapi id 15.01.0130.020; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 20:26:07 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "Zuniga, Juan Carlos" <JuanCarlos.Zuniga@InterDigital.com>, "draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
Thread-Topic: Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
Thread-Index: AdBrHeUvMOmHRKvzSsuuWoWBg4qFNgGTuWtAAAEOeuA=
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 20:26:07 +0000
Message-ID: <CO1PR05MB442581A7F90D01000C9FD37AEFD0@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <785DB11636645E438E2E096E1ADA47C410718A4A@NABESITE.InterDigital.com>
In-Reply-To: <785DB11636645E438E2E096E1ADA47C410718A4A@NABESITE.InterDigital.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12]
authentication-results: InterDigital.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1PR05MB443;
x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(377454003)(19617315012)(2501003)(122556002)(40100003)(77156002)(86362001)(99286002)(54356999)(62966003)(76576001)(76176999)(15975445007)(102836002)(50986999)(16236675004)(19625215002)(2900100001)(92566002)(230783001)(2950100001)(19300405004)(46102003)(19580395003)(2656002)(19580405001)(87936001)(74316001)(33656002)(66066001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR05MB443; H:CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO1PR05MB4432ECBDC5348DBB65491BCAEFD0@CO1PR05MB443.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5002010)(5005006); SRVR:CO1PR05MB443; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO1PR05MB443;
x-forefront-prvs: 0539EEBD11
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CO1PR05MB442581A7F90D01000C9FD37AEFD0CO1PR05MB442namprd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Apr 2015 20:26:07.3430 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR05MB443
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/KNaE8biguYnIAaMUlfkPcsteSZ4>
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "intarea-chairs@ietf.org" <intarea-chairs@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 20:26:12 -0000

Folks,

I will try to produce a new version by COB tomorrow.

                                               Ron


From: Zuniga, Juan Carlos [mailto:JuanCarlos.Zuniga@InterDigital.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 4:02 PM
To: draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6@tools.ietf.org
Cc: int-area@ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org; intarea-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6

Authors,

The WGLC has ended. Please produce a new version of the document taking into account the comments received on the lists and submit a summary of the different issues addressed in this new version.

Best,

Juan Carlos
(as Int-Area WG co-chair)

From: Zuniga, Juan Carlos
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 4:27 PM
To: 'int-area@ietf.org'; 'ipv6@ietf.org'
Cc: 'draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6@tools.ietf.org'; intarea-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:intarea-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6


Dear Int-Area and 6man WGs,



At the Int-Area WG meeting in Dallas there were some comments on draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6. It was decided to submit the document for WG Last Call to the Int-Area & 6man WGs as soon as the agreed changes were made.



The document has now been updated accordingly, so this email starts an Int-Area/6man WGs Last Call on:



http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6-04



Please respond to this email to support the document and/or send comments by 2015-04-06.



In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)":

Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules?

(See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.)



Best,



Juan Carlos Zuniga
(as Int-Area WG co-chair)