RE: Mail regarding draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis

<john.loughney@nokia.com> Tue, 13 December 2011 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <john.loughney@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9061E21F8ACA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:57:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, DEAR_SOMETHING=1.605, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_102=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_62=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_71=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_82=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d0KRH0p7USEA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:57:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-sa02.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.1.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF52121F8A97 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:56:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh105.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.31]) by mgw-sa02.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id pBDHuvhn011259; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:56:57 +0200
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.56]) by vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:56:57 +0200
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-015.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.5.97]) by 008-AM1MMR1-001.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.56]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.003; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:56:56 +0100
From: john.loughney@nokia.com
To: zyh1898@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Mail regarding draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis
Thread-Topic: Mail regarding draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis
Thread-Index: AQHMuVQle7KA1FwOC0a1XLi+PJ/+NJXaDjNQ
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:56:56 +0000
Message-ID: <2129067463716F46AC77A22602E5CB5C01FF6AA0@008-AM1MPN1-015.mgdnok.nokia.com>
References: <C716BA6AD50D45FA8C5F5BE8561BEC93@zyhPC>
In-Reply-To: <C716BA6AD50D45FA8C5F5BE8561BEC93@zyhPC>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-tituslabs-classifications-30: TLPropertyRoot=Nokia; Confidentiality=Company Confidential; Project=None;
x-titus-version: 3.3.8.1
x-tituslabs-classificationhash-30: VgNFIFU9Hx+/nZJb9Kg7IjV2rptLnNm/Z3hNP38OqfSHS+Ug4NOZ+vXVixUB2KoUA4HxY4kro9OWC/Z/FZ6QfyQBszkK/C7Gj3szRnwjbkJ3wVmfIsVtAR/DepAn25koK2yNCaQW/7YfPgPncXQ9QA4IAWVHnNCGTdw813+412E8tS/vDpy+9JjsyoRXYO1r4cypcDEzXKzAHSD6uXo1nE+Qo2AtzU2qfrFMcId4XGoq3DAOTzsjpRYTL8b0hdVD
x-headerinfofordlp: None
x-originating-ip: [10.243.186.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2129067463716F46AC77A22602E5CB5C01FF6AA0008AM1MPN1015mg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Dec 2011 17:56:57.0308 (UTC) FILETIME=[9B0CF9C0:01CCB9C0]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:57:01 -0000

I am forwarding this to the IPv6 Maintenance mailing list.  Discussion of this sort can take place on the mailing list.

John

From: ext zyh [mailto:zyh1898@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 8:31 PM
To: draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Mail regarding draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis

Dear Sir:


    As a Chinese,I am writing to express my deep concern about the change of IPSEC in IPv6 Node Requirements(draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-11).

    Frankly speaking,my country has enforced the world most rigorous censorship on the Internet,so we can not access twitter,Facebook and other world famous websites directly.And Google services there is very unstable.The Internet is becoming almost a intranet there.

    But thanks to the force implementation of IPSEC in IPV6,the government is unable to enforce deep packet inspection,so we can easily surf the Internet through IPV6.So  I'm afraid that once the requirement of IPSEC change from MUST to SHOULD,we will have a bleak future inevitably.

    I believe you will take my concern into account and I will be more than happy to see some changes in this regard soon.



Yours sincerely

zhang yuhao