IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Network Scanning

Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> Fri, 04 April 2008 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipv6-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C0D3A68AA; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0573A68AA for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cdFNorGl0fEw for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from abaddon.unfix.org (abaddon.unfix.org [IPv6:2001:41e0:ff00:0:216:3eff:fe00:4]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924C33A67FE for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:41e0:ff42:b00:216:cfff:fe00:e7d0] (spaghetti.ch.unfix.org [IPv6:2001:41e0:ff42:b00:216:cfff:fe00:e7d0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jeroen) by abaddon.unfix.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 605B9402045; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:14:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <47F6A85A.4080606@spaghetti.zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:14:50 +0200
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
Organization: Unfix
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian McGehee <doc@tavian.com>
Subject: Re: Network Scanning
References: <200804042201.m34M1JvB007788@omr12.networksolutionsemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200804042201.m34M1JvB007788@omr12.networksolutionsemail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
OpenPGP: id=333E7C23
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.92.1, clamav-milter version 0.92.1 on abaddon.unfix.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0991922892=="
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org

Brian McGehee wrote:
> "ping6 ff02::1
> 
> Which should make every single host on a link answer to it."
> 
> 
> Answer with it's link-local address, which is probably not the goal.

Then what is the goal? Negative comments are great, but not so very 
useful, if people want the correct answer to their wrong answers they 
need to be more correct with their questions.

Greets,
  Jeroen


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email