[IPv6]Re: ICMP Query and ICMP Query for IOAM
xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Thu, 26 February 2026 03:45 UTC
Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ipv6@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipv6@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE18BE6CDF4; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 19:45:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.194
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.194 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rq1lDaNENsay; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 19:45:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (mxct.zte.com.cn [183.62.165.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E670BE6CD61; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 19:45:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4fLy5w0vLsz51STh; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 11:45:24 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njy2app08.zte.com.cn ([10.40.13.206]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 61Q3jGUM007465; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 11:45:17 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app08[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 11:45:18 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2b00699fc1ce532-9c6a3
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20260226114518209kjmBLcxXOQ7E0ZMDqPWtE@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <7004400B-4395-444E-9EF3-8D35BFA67CC7@gmx.de>
References: 202602251610531651HaLLkCnP4dNLyNu4jw5h@zte.com.cn,7004400B-4395-444E-9EF3-8D35BFA67CC7@gmx.de
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 11:45:18 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: moeller0@gmx.de
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 61Q3jGUM007465
X-TLS: YES
X-SPF-DOMAIN: zte.com.cn
X-ENVELOPE-SENDER: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
X-SPF: None
X-SOURCE-IP: 10.5.228.133 unknown Thu, 26 Feb 2026 11:45:24 +0800
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 699FC1D4.000/4fLy5w0vLsz51STh
Message-ID-Hash: YHTGVWPVOXT4VYZZQ6YDJZW3QRCWNGMT
X-Message-ID-Hash: YHTGVWPVOXT4VYZZQ6YDJZW3QRCWNGMT
X-MailFrom: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ipv6.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: int-area@ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [IPv6]Re: ICMP Query and ICMP Query for IOAM
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group (6man)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/LnerEJ1R6HfJBsB0NDuvF2GbSDA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ipv6-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ipv6-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ipv6-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Sebastian, Thank you for the review and good comments. As Ron has replied, we'll incorporate your comments into the next revision. Just one reminder, draft-ietf-6man-icmpv6-ioam-conf-state-10 provides some examples of actual queries for you to assess. Cheers, Xiao Min Original From: SebastianMoeller <moeller0@gmx.de> To: 肖敏10093570; Cc: int-area@ietf.org <int-area@ietf.org>;ipv6@ietf.org <ipv6@ietf.org>; Date: 2026年02月25日 18:14 Subject: Re: [IPv6]ICMP Query and ICMP Query for IOAM Hi, quick note: The draft states: To prevent denial of service attacks, the ICMP Query Response message MUST NOT be longer than the corresponding ICMP Query Request message. IMHO this reasonable requirement does prevent amplification more than it inhibits denial of service attacks... How well this lends itself to denial of service attacks (on the queried host), IMHO, depends more on how costly the requested pieces of information are to gather... and since the draft refers to another (not yet written?) draft for the actual queries this is hard to assess. For using this to create reflection attacks on other hosts this size limit really also only affects the effective amplification when using that attack vector, but if an attacker commands enough nodes no amplification is required to create a denial of service attack. So I would just rephrase that sentence from "To prevent denial of service attacks,..." to "To remove to potential of abusing this as a means of attack amplification,..." Regards Sebastian > On 25. Feb 2026, at 09:10, xiao.min2@zte.com.cn wrote: > > Dear all, > > A new document draft-xbm-intarea-icmp-query-00 has been submitted. This draft introduces two new ICMP messages (ICMP Query Request/Response) for the purpose of IP node information query. > After that, draft-ietf-6man-icmpv6-conf-state was updated and its basis was changed from RFC 4620 to draft-xbm-intarea-icmp-query. > Links for the two drafts are as below. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xbm-intarea-icmp-query-00 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-icmpv6-ioam-conf-state-10 > Looking forward to your review and comments. > > Cheers, > Xiao Min > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > List Info: https://mailman3.ietf.org/mailman3/lists/ipv6@ietf.org/ > --------------------------------------------------------------------
- [IPv6]ICMP Query and ICMP Query for IOAM xiao.min2
- [IPv6]Re: ICMP Query and ICMP Query for IOAM Sebastian Moeller
- [IPv6]Re: [Int-area] Re: ICMP Query and ICMP Quer… Paul Vixie
- [IPv6]Re: [Int-area] ICMP Query and ICMP Query fo… Sebastian Moeller
- [IPv6]Re: [Int-area] Re: ICMP Query and ICMP Quer… Bonica, Ron
- [IPv6]Re: [Int-area] Re: ICMP Query and ICMP Quer… Paul Vixie
- [IPv6]Re: [Int-area] Re: ICMP Query and ICMP Quer… Bonica, Ron
- [IPv6]Re: [Int-area] Re: ICMP Query and ICMP Quer… Bonica, Ron
- [IPv6]Re: ICMP Query and ICMP Query for IOAM xiao.min2
- [IPv6]Re: [Int-area] ICMP Query and ICMP Query fo… Tal Mizrahi
- [IPv6]Re: [Int-area] ICMP Query and ICMP Query fo… xiao.min2
- [IPv6]Re: [Int-area] ICMP Query and ICMP Query fo… Tal Mizrahi
- [IPv6]Re: [Int-area] ICMP Query and ICMP Query fo… xiao.min2