Re: IPv6 Formal Anycast Addresses and Functional Anycast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-smith-6man-form-func-anycast-addresses-01.txt)

Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 23:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1F6120819 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:34:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3dkxxdW1vlSm for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:34:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A88E120ABB for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id p59so14561501edp.7 for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 15:34:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7EbPlaq6Bj++COjmeo0p7v/lLs9gCwKQbdVf9/jYPK0=; b=XBDeuVWgv23YnxFfeNvez8y8wohFRFDOZOc1yCMKQ5i6EECSSoKiL3Ed1nUVfxh5MN pVbSy9SSOkRMvKCSK3kKdFIsdWZZPrxRgwZTVKKi2U4nl2lCxtriaFFCgRlBsVtg/AFb ilu+7Hgno+BsKpwovQjyZlsHZklUQccXpX3P5ZKgwppFjU12BrVL2Rufycn+BpmQQZf0 hIUqyhgYIpm0Ly/j0f+7LO3rPYw/OZnQM0LST6tt8x5VOUdQvxVRWA3J+3dWR0JN6Wrb he3c6/fVk9JKGM+Wzg2IBbzPcIB4QT6bcfVQSlMr79kSE9mYsP7zX5tnbYLm22xQfAzb uqOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7EbPlaq6Bj++COjmeo0p7v/lLs9gCwKQbdVf9/jYPK0=; b=hhj90mJi80qkK7GM3gUq5JtaGDMgihey+gVVVdRzb3w85Ffv8CVfDN77zod9DOQKrn WC8GRyMCv3utbPMBjZma+zOAmez0JTIUw7d0z6yMMDmfG9Ud4h4n1SI/Flk7Ze7UxZRW Xw6JFmI2wdYBIn4WfgGQVn8pG1cXsRonIMwvfWWnDyO5PjnkLdu1/Sk26RegsNuDDvzo ecczrWek95WWLL7t/SGsgBPWZ0t/G2Ye4VqOg81ni83BLD+HHniM49tA1r4fadgQ5e+d BdNwDDQHgg1hYR8qeJ1DwrxH8D8BCFo9r0J+za8d572O1sNQCznsS9nPF3xww4OMIiDi eT0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUSF8hj7/kfqCPjkoth6g6StWMpE+QgRFFPQmf3HLvBEDcQDYPv VOYvoW3hU2mnXNrfCOrfOPpjdO7Kf6/E0Cc1v/I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8e/AHweSYg6C7RUvZiLCIuWFh4vYKXke6MBHOt/W8nZWcOzQxVaHBcY3d6/iHxqs9nn4afZUGNZkFlLKgiBA=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:91c4:: with SMTP id h4mr32620490eda.36.1572910444120; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 15:34:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157277906705.13535.345852921709779212.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAO42Z2wSU-puDaQq-PzTCTE=S3qyqUNrPhH0pgOEO_d3=StnHA@mail.gmail.com> <b97c15c0-b1fe-0d78-0897-5fc4bb6a9a34@foobar.org> <B42E6EED-5620-49BE-BB3D-B1CF6F04A1CC@gmail.com> <20191103212712.GK2287@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <B2A9EAB8-BF52-4302-BB77-70EE252F45E5@gmail.com> <24313.1572827211@localhost> <CAO42Z2y_qpaxMz86Oj6E5OHJr_whJit_2P7zwqNK3CbrKSZhyg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2y_qpaxMz86Oj6E5OHJr_whJit_2P7zwqNK3CbrKSZhyg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:33:52 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMGpriU_p7RG9rDrqONgWAiw+cqvuQ4ktSFD6H9SL5gfDSnrzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 Formal Anycast Addresses and Functional Anycast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-smith-6man-form-func-anycast-addresses-01.txt)
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000490e9605968dc049"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/MC5yQa-grLpD09eAqP6oZE5g1QM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 23:34:07 -0000

>
> Host Identity Protocol could have also achieve this.
>
> I've started to wondered if solving the identifier/locator problem
> within the transport layer, using temporary transport layer connection
> identifiers - a  32 bit 'token' in MPTCP, rather than persistent host
> identifiers, might be the better solution. It's certainly has been
> much more successful at being deployed - Apple put MPTCP in iOS 7 and
> it was being used for Siri (don't know if it still is).
>

Add to this QUIC's connection id(s).  I quite like some things about HIP,
and in general I think that at this point implementing a "session layer"
via these MPTCP/QUIC -style mechanisms is the best path forward.