IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 17 October 2019 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3659E120904; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5jC0hVDEcl2w; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com (mail-ed1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0CD0120902; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id r4so2106196edy.4; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6QSEZsG4aWXAOCH9quaMfZY98KdeXchkYQxWNGuJnYs=; b=b4vyEckr9EtNQuctHuJGRgq8unR9DY7Wyg4m0geFXF8n06kbrr9PhoVUVFWfcFS+7O Nij8gvEjU9zKUgUqzohXNsRogNDODmQQsVHnCBhyu3Vv8SgLmyuVVIRu6yedj4Ik3SJG YEFF/xtOS6XQYAJ7QlUJj5xqAC9si2kb2r0EzRShfVK1oweS9cGtsVDzqm2TEkeVhTDB sSduHyo+KUmuqf351GjTs2IF3k6dPeQaVoNYLTNg8xdIlu7bjYfEFbW7yClBJNgjt3dO eglCfEXHRauFFvEkSln3ZCwaHF+4TddJJXUp/PnAztLlHgs5GgV476p0HfIcRcq0x+0d ZYmw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6QSEZsG4aWXAOCH9quaMfZY98KdeXchkYQxWNGuJnYs=; b=d9fH7DdVMjV780jHZDDyWLjy2lFaY3YO9SyRUUfBRc4QivsYBH0SXBm3phBhJYUkuy IBKii8V2QAW6rmrBKQdwhPfE8qT18YeNqippVkl6b8+HOwSISjC0wIXozlNvVpuuc7ms xae5Qsldv1CpvZ6cTRL3TQKbrMlffJxva6MtuS5uMVFMYc7xK7MBreO8NNuK+QweEWWS mmnX0DUkVcFtKamj0TfIJERJTZGhxssGE1Laykm3XYH/YFkoqCWuJfNo8mKogKziqOp4 gt+jBTAmNMfGzqhqHpV9SQGqa39ImRwQz8rCrODggmpMB4M8eoZWGBcTtahs+h6SN+11 FZnw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW1w6V/QO3Mc7s6fYngAPdjWswI3QgNUMvhgq8ycdLtIBut7O// SAgt4Tbo0l95jgJQI/eBip2SlEtdaiWBBrOe714=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxXxd1stKa3B/OABNqWuDrAwtqVo0DVd+KgpsJbTbdKTwbtdYkcz2R57Xj6J1iAl/6oX6Lisrguo7hBAUOJbVw=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d8c6:: with SMTP id k6mr4482603eds.87.1571326587329; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:36:26 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C4D789FC-1C0F-46CF-9FAF-806B82764EEE@cisco.com>
References: <156766402665.22715.7095504311935416700.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <C4D789FC-1C0F-46CF-9FAF-806B82764EEE@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:36:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsx8GD9YdQUG1Zc1vG4fn0NS-kHPpJKbZSOcTW8MtO3n8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
To: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header@ietf.org>, "6man-chairs@ietf.org" <6man-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Robert Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000010605105951cfb1e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/NSby5Vc-LDSdMZDIHfjCStkZfYU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 15:36:38 -0000

On October 9, 2019 at 12:41:34 PM, Darren Dukes (ddukes) (ddukes@cisco.com
(mailto:ddukes@cisco.com)) wrote:

Darren:

Hi!

> > On Sep 5, 2019, at 2:13 AM, Alvaro Retana via Datatracker wrote:
...
> > I am balloting DISCUSS because the description of "TLVs that may change
en
> > route" is not clear or specific enough. I would like to see a clear
> > specification of what "TLVs that may change en route" are, *AND*
> > corresponding instructions to the Designated Experts-to-be.

The DISCUSS was based on the combination of the description of "TLVs that
may change en route" *and* the registration policy.  Now that the
registration policy has been changed to IETF Review, I think my point may
be moot. :-(

I'm clearing.

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email