Re: [v6ops] State of play

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 02 February 2016 04:11 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EA21A6F57; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 20:11:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CishmxmrqkX6; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 20:10:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 887371A6F61; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 20:10:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5327; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1454386254; x=1455595854; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=rKi1783Vq9rh696lnOH00aZJnCI9RnSiSPkyZ0UkSPI=; b=WutFRvguxOp7MIeNLgjnkm/mbgBTLhYeDKmbArRHpZn5U27sMjtbR/ss 9hkDF2XvRzHolvbXeNSgHv0oZwTKKd6M9+iHBkjTC+VMI8GLNDRsih9Ve +N5VLu6Ie0/+W8D6naDZivpBO6TvXkquhfcqmYqytZDAY7o2EzaQrnSbl Y=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CyAgB0K7BW/4sNJK1egzpSbQaIU7FfDoFkGAqFbQKBNjgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhEEBAQEDAQEBAWsLBQkCAgEIGC4bDAslAgQKBAUOiAUIDr14AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDQgEh3gIgkKEEwEBW4JtgQ8FjSWJTAGCeYFjaogEgVtKjEuKbINRAR4BQ4NsagGIOjR8AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,383,1449532800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="69151054"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 02 Feb 2016 04:10:53 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (xch-rcd-012.cisco.com [173.37.102.22]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u124ArxG011943 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 04:10:53 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) by XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (173.37.102.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:10:52 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:10:52 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] State of play
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] State of play
Thread-Index: AQHRXWy7WKRnV1axq0Cue0ZfkN2Y9w==
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 04:10:52 +0000
Message-ID: <D8D6B933-5786-48A2-8C4C-7A38BCC14B41@cisco.com>
References: <201602011400.u11E0Hsd009385@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <20160201231151.25706414D77A@rock.dv.isc.org> <61DE78D0-8B8D-4BD3-B6B4-5275B118D6F5@cisco.com> <20160202035520.9932E415A9C9@rock.dv.isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160202035520.9932E415A9C9@rock.dv.isc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.4.81]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C3A52B19-0A1F-40FC-8A7D-B9FD9111C660"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/O9AKqOxUT_P44v7DhJ6vDZzitaE>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, IPv6 IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 04:11:03 -0000

I would guess it belongs in 6man, but I'll let the 6man chairs decide whether they agree.

> On Feb 1, 2016, at 7:55 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> In message <61DE78D0-8B8D-4BD3-B6B4-5275B118D6F5@cisco.com>, "Fred Baker (fred)
> " writes:
>> 
>> When you say "v6man", I assume you mean "6man".
> 
> yep.
> 
>> I'm a little lost. I don't see the words "chair" or "question" in the =
>> draft. Could you be more specific about what your question is?
> 
> Which WG should take ownership of the problem space in this draft?
> 
> Mark
> 
>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> draft-andrews-tcp-and-ipv6-use-minmtu-04 has an open question directed
>>> at the v6man and v6ops chairs - should this be a v6man or v6ops?  It
>>> needs to be fixed and I don't care in which forum it gets done but it
>>> needs to be done.
>>> =20
>>> Mark
>>> =20
>>> In message <201602011400.u11E0Hsd009385@irp-lnx1.cisco.com>, =
>> fred@cisco.com writes:
>>>> RFC Editor: AUTH48
>>>> 	2015-11-23	draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption
>>>> 	2015-10-26	draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc
>>>> 	2015-10-26	draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat
>>>> 	2015-10-26	draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam
>>>> =20
>>>> RFC Editor: In ISE Review
>>>> 	2016-01-20	draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile
>>>> =20
>>>> IESG: AD Evaluation
>>>> 	2016-01-31	draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis
>>>> =20
>>>> IESG: In Last Call
>>>> 	2016-01-28	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world
>>>> =20
>>>> WG: Unupdated WG Document
>>>> 	2015-10-19	draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices
>>>> =20
>>>> WG: Updated WG Document
>>>> 	2016-01-21	draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
>>>> 	2016-01-03	draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability
>>>> =20
>>>> Individual Submission: Unupdated
>>>> 	2015-10-19	draft-xu-v6ops-dslite-redundancy
>>>> 	2015-10-15	draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
>>>> 	2015-09-21	draft-ybai-v6ops-ipv6-for-openstack
>>>> =20
>>>> Individual Submission: Updated
>>>> 	2016-01-05	draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost
>>>> 	2016-01-03	draft-xcf-v6ops-chinatelecom-deployment
>>>> 	2016-01-03	draft-xli-v6ops-cernet-deployment
>>>> =20
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> v6ops mailing list
>>>> v6ops@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>> --
>>> Mark Andrews, ISC
>>> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>>> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
>> 
>> 
>> --Apple-Mail=_99008B0B-2380-47D5-A518-D24FACDEAD89
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
>> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
>> Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
>> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>> 
>> iQIVAwUBVrAnTkayAOS/EQ8MAQL9Ug//e/6aNfv+AC2Iv2qAp6MjcIYyRcqRZLew
>> hhXABkYFTk+/FPHe57xZ4W7h4eEpJ7L8Fha+M+tEzB1ydNc/n/3NsThP6iZCsIYE
>> lemKravU5zMVEvGLeWoaj9YUdKXzlqgIT6TjcE/0wuyUS6a5MotVMXqLKNkwbwg5
>> IIX1lZNeSWmc7dtWUIeh9/UzgzlGap9Nd0+MhQVoWvPXgNv4Xvq9AhFSOZsz3r1L
>> dtiOGn6cwypfrNleDt7D62jtWpmtyM/R7CjDBVhEhDVXyEiEt5/BfPnfB8e5+Ozt
>> +PvIPw7rPe3Y6tg37kZLTySOiHiJ0UDPCwk7B3KQtYlnfKjFmQ0w8aad+I9Gw7x6
>> FtUuMZZn5GDzkzR1dpBMr9J2KGjtwO7szDo8C/ZONEfwzTkXwepvxfZoW8eQuTIu
>> E09eFvtUmmpE5w3K9sU/8ku8h+rtNf85GO5rozDwGBlflZAnRHpE61UZZqHAenBm
>> HZIdLBxpZ56RQYzCN+ifrjR4ELTIfI0tUWVJSUWuW34hTpYfLFxWvi+BLLwnDbyC
>> brKIPmBtpks6HKctM/D4YBDiLC0/ZvvsmlWnzCX1ZxdkzZNm0Ah0rSvSP7I/wICA
>> x6tcJPMrUehuA13koaI++2SE7mI87wZb8DygbnxobCgwRwKJz2JgjATFPoV3Asyz
>> whJD47Pn2t8=
>> =0jdz
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> 
>> --Apple-Mail=_99008B0B-2380-47D5-A518-D24FACDEAD89--
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org