Re: Offset Indicating option

John Leslie <john@jlc.net> Mon, 26 September 2011 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jlc.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3420721F8DA8 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 07:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.258
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.258 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.341, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3LUyvdnNifl1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 07:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.jlc.net (mailhost.jlc.net [199.201.159.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6FE21F8DA5 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 07:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mailhost.jlc.net (Postfix, from userid 104) id 48CF033C23; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:38:49 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:38:49 -0400
From: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Offset Indicating option
Message-ID: <20110926143849.GH2931@verdi>
References: <4E7FDEFA.6060808@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4E7FDEFA.6060808@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:36:07 -0000

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> draft-zhang-6man-offset-option-01 proposes an idea for how to make it
> easier for a node that needs to skip over an IPv6 header chain to do
> so quickly...

   Alas, Brian, this strikes me as a rather bad idea -- introducing
ambiguity and almost inviting gaming the system so that the same packet
looks different to a DPI device and the actual destination.

   IMHO, any node interested in such details of the payload should be
prepared to run at wire speed -- with a dedicated pipeline element if
anyone were so foolish as to perform this in the "backbone".

--
John Leslie <john@jlc.net>