Question on Security Considerations for "draft-macaulay-6man-packet-stain"
Ed Juskevicius <edj.etc@gmail.com> Thu, 01 March 2012 17:44 UTC
Return-Path: <edj.etc@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA15821F8ACA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:44:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EdeZuFZP1Bke for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:44:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE0121F8AB9 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vcbfk13 with SMTP id fk13so800727vcb.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of edj.etc@gmail.com designates 10.52.179.10 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.179.10;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of edj.etc@gmail.com designates 10.52.179.10 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=edj.etc@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=edj.etc@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.179.10]) by 10.52.179.10 with SMTP id dc10mr9667803vdc.118.1330623869127 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:44:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cQYNjMEQx5GuD7WMA9Izb0fZ9g//bojY0SxkUFN0F6A=; b=MCHwqUmj7whYlebrmu8KjwkV1zJUDmB3ZmaQH6ysOlqBW1pX1AuEpxQbC4oirCWhVH wtW0Bfr8PgQQMzjwZSgsfgVnJ5KZuwAjQJGS5xItsIA8BETWEOOjsyK8CjrsNyvLRCpa JjTVpuhq+KX4UhmvWm6ConoZ0yrckTKkaer/A=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.179.10 with SMTP id dc10mr8171339vdc.118.1330623869059; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.170.174 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:44:29 -0500
Message-ID: <CALRYWsOR0kg_LcPjRVZW8xtDAK09H9HBaHc3TP-7jQ_R4bdrRg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Question on Security Considerations for "draft-macaulay-6man-packet-stain"
From: Ed Juskevicius <edj.etc@gmail.com>
To: tyson.macaulay@bell.ca
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec51964670b842904ba320386"
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:44:43 -0000
Hello Tyson. I have a few questions on your I-D about "IPv6 packet staining". Let me start with one that concerns security considerations. In Section 7, the I-D mentions reputational algorithms for cyber intelligence and then it cautions implementers about unspecified hazards associated with the source of intelligence and the protection of the algorithms. Where are the algorithms (mentioned in Section 7) to be applied? In the PMDs? At the end points? In a different locations or element altogether?" Thanks in advance, Ed J.
- Question on Security Considerations for "draft-ma… Ed Juskevicius