RE: What's 16 bits between friends?

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Wed, 19 September 2007 13:54 UTC

Return-path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IY00t-00071u-Fs; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:54:47 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IY00s-0006zg-Ao for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:54:46 -0400
Received: from slb-smtpout-01.boeing.com ([130.76.64.48]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IY00j-0002Nt-5P for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:54:46 -0400
Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (stl-av-01.boeing.com [192.76.190.6]) by slb-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/8.14.0/SMTPOUT) with ESMTP id l8JDsCau002696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 19 Sep 2007 06:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id l8JDsCA7023877; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:54:12 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from XCH-NWBH-11.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwbh-11.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.55.84]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id l8JDrk3W022787; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:54:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.54.35]) by XCH-NWBH-11.nw.nos.boeing.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 19 Sep 2007 06:54:05 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 06:53:53 -0700
Message-ID: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1029EDA69@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B0010D71B2@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: What's 16 bits between friends?
Thread-Index: Acf6PeWrReKiMYqfSMG1A7ZUQxtiZQAU0SnAAAy3uwA=
References: <20070918120411.GF2363@cs.uni-bonn.de><46EFD636.7040008@ca.afilias.info><D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B0010D6F7E@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net><46F03060.6010504@ca.afilias.info><20070919072001.cb00b1d6.ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org> <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B0010D71B2@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: michael.dillon@bt.com, ipv6@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Sep 2007 13:54:05.0288 (UTC) FILETIME=[8AD1AE80:01C7FAC4]
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
Cc:
Subject: RE: What's 16 bits between friends?
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org

> According to RFC 3627 /128 is not a good idea. It should be /126.

RFC3627 doesn't say that. It says: "Using two /128
addresses is also one, though often cumbersome,
approach.", but it doesn't say that using /128 is
not a good idea.

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------