Re: [rfc2462bis] reword "stateful" for other config info?

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Sun, 23 May 2004 05:40 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (www.iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA16444 for <ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:40:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BRlYe-00023x-6t for ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:30:00 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i4N5U0x5007922 for ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:30:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BRlWl-0001hI-Hp for ipv6-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:28:03 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA16160 for <ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:28:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BRlWi-0006GE-E2 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:28:00 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BRlVp-00062q-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:27:05 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BRlVI-0005pa-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:26:32 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BRlP0-0008UQ-Ry; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:20:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BRlN3-00085F-7Q for ipv6@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:18:01 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA15901 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:17:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BRlN0-0003xS-6C for ipv6@ietf.org; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:17:58 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BRlM1-0003jd-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:16:58 -0400
Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp ([202.249.10.124]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BRlL5-0003NK-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:15:59 -0400
Received: from ocean.jinmei.org (unknown [2001:200:0:8002:587e:bff9:bea7:bcdb]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6771525D; Sun, 23 May 2004 14:15:53 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 14:15:54 +0900
Message-ID: <y7vr7tb9111.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
To: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rfc2462bis] reword "stateful" for other config info?
In-Reply-To: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B0644C131@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>
References: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B0644C131@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: ipv6-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IP Version 6 Working Group (ipv6) <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2004 23:08:24 -0400, 
>>>>> "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com> said:

> Your wording works for me well.  Good suggestion too.

Thanks, glad to hear that.  But please let me check one thing: do you
have any preference between the solutions?  That is,

>> 1. remove "stateful" from the definition of the O flag (in
>> rfc2461bis), [...]
>> and reword rfc2462bis accordingly.

or

>> 2. do not touch the definition of the O flag, but add notes for
>> clarification in rfc2462bis like this:
[snip]

I guess you meant solution 2 by "wording", but I'm not really sure.

Thanks,

					JINMEI, Tatuya
					Communication Platform Lab.
					Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
					jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------