Re: A6 record status
David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Fri, 12 August 2011 17:16 UTC
Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC30A21F8745 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QHLpmq0HnAzB for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trantor.virtualized.org (trantor.virtualized.org [199.48.134.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C29C21F85AC for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.10] (cpe-66-91-109-17.hawaii.res.rr.com [66.91.109.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: drc) by trantor.virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E43941703F; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:17:03 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: A6 record status
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110812071132.0B6CD12C1D5B@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 07:17:01 -1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A72BF956-5632-4774-B610-CE6CCB74149D@virtualized.org>
References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B9201228398@SZXEML506-MBS.china.huawei.com> <4E3F5166.8000605@gmail.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B9201228515@SZXEML506-MBS.china.huawei.com> <750E838E-3962-4893-A2D0-012576A1BF36@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|7906899305f1bb5341fe3f32269a1f49n779ac03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|750E838E-3962-4893-A2D0-012576A1BF36@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <4E406303.4040603@gmail.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B920122B288@SZXEML506-MBS.china.huawei.com> <4E43378D.8070505@gmail.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B920122B2E1@SZXEML506-MBS.china.huawei.com> <4E4345BB.5060103@gmail.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B920122B36A@SZXEML506-MBS.china.huawei.com> <4E445261.3040506@gmail.com> <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A8895615@szxeml526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <22F6318E46E26B498ABC828879B08D4F1786A07E@TK5EX14MBXW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <20110811234742.C922612BD870@drugs.dv.isc.org> <4E447C7E.30202@gmail.com> <20110812045644.39BF212BFBCF@drugs.dv.isc.or g> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B920122BD2C@SZXEML506-MBS.china.huawei.com> <20110812071132.0B6CD12C1D5B@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:16:28 -0000
Mark, On Aug 11, 2011, at 9:11 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > The root servers are getting 100's of A6 q/s (~20:1 AAAA:A6 > <http://k.root-servers.org/statistics/GLOBAL/daily/>). Yeah, so? The vast majority of the queries hitting the root servers are useless crap. 100's of A6 qps is in the noise. > There is > still a very large base of A6 using software out there regardless > of whether they are getting NODATA responses or not. And keeping an RFC as experimental is going to change that how? > I don't know what percentage of responses are NODATA and what have > actual A6 records. I do think we need to know answers to these sorts > of questions. Why? What possible difference will it make? Regards, -drc
- A6 record status Brian E Carpenter
- Re: A6 record status Sander Steffann
- RE: A6 record status Tina TSOU
- RE: A6 record status Christian Huitema
- Re: A6 record status Mark Andrews
- RE: A6 record status Jiangsheng
- Re: A6 record status Brian E Carpenter
- Re: A6 record status Mark Andrews
- RE: A6 record status Sheng Jiang
- Re: A6 record status Roger Jørgensen
- Re: A6 record status Mark Andrews
- Re: A6 record status SM
- RE: A6 record status Sheng Jiang
- RE : A6 record status Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: A6 record status David Conrad
- Re: A6 record status Brian E Carpenter
- Re: A6 record status Ralph Droms
- Re: A6 record status David Conrad
- Re: A6 record status Mark Andrews