Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-optimistic-dad-02.txt

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi> Thu, 23 September 2004 11:08 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA01072 for <ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:08:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CARZm-0005FD-GA for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:15:51 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAROh-0000b0-1I; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:04:23 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CARK0-0008VC-Bq for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:59:32 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA00439 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:59:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from p2.piuha.net ([131.160.192.2]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CARQl-000550-UY for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:06:32 -0400
Received: from kolumbus.fi (p2.piuha.net [131.160.192.2]) by p2.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2754589873; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:59:29 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4152AC54.4060204@kolumbus.fi>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:58:28 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409231218330.2466-100000@netcore.fi>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409231218330.2466-100000@netcore.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IPv6 WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-optimistic-dad-02.txt
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> ==> sorry for not saying this earlier, but this seems unacceptable to
> me.  SEND specs are already in the RFC-ed queue, and the WG has been
> closed.  This IMHO needs to be analyzed here.  I.e., analyze and state
> how oDAD interacts (or not) with SEND.  AFAICS, there shouldn't be any
> showstoppers here..

I agree with Pekka that it should be covered. But I also
thought that at least an earlier version of the document
already had SEND support...

--Jari


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------