a comment on draft-stenberg-mif-mpvd-dns-00
神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Tue, 03 November 2015 06:56 UTC
Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3FE1B2EDC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:56:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qd5PnnO9NoXF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:56:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C8231B2ECA for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:56:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by igbdj2 with SMTP id dj2so6657122igb.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 22:56:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uSYDpAXya6YysBBPs7r1giGpaBKFvP7y4FP0Gi/S7GU=; b=lEDMZpRi3l6t5Ye794/iKheMA4HpJqDVK1PHZA58Ced9rOFGv0I3T8CW0vlLwwJ5Eh YZpD9QeIEEJm9mjT98kl8Yhio6x5jcxy+N01QEzbJvLjSQ/1jNtmEcLpjuDDqsjlDW5Y m1SmcK+AOhPZoqPO8RUbjLh1fz19l3AWjPEtfFRwQIp46WJE9boI1sIxeQxmM/26HSyQ QKKr08ISMcIyqu2d8I+YB58vpe5TVbwrNruNqzvlimYQTysSmsuPmaN6IxroaFhXa528 K0wMPT63HCkuWA4Cv0VOCSqgNYYAIiP/WBg+qUhKPHyzDR1RxbmX8RkLh1HaDVAEVHFH l5vw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.117.102 with SMTP id kd6mr14093365igb.41.1446533804596; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 22:56:44 -0800 (PST)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.140.71 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:56:44 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:56:44 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: STOgsHxlFdpGElpgniviq-syp_0
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqf6Khd-pZCjY9ekZoEh3bFaatfpgxEVz8OvNwUuHXSgyA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: a comment on draft-stenberg-mif-mpvd-dns-00
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: draft-stenberg-mif-mpvd-dns@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/RcTkbhZnNuyKsQy4wkSbHw6GP58>
Cc: IPv6 IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 06:56:46 -0000
I have one quick comment on draft-stenberg-mif-mpvd-dns-00: about the use of TXT RR. From a quick read it seems to me to violate the general guidance of avoiding abuse of TXT as described in RFC5507. Is there any specific reason why this must be TXT despite the recommendation of the RFC? If there is, I think the draft should explain it more explicitly; if not, I'd suggest getting and using a new type of RR for this purpose. -- JINMEI, Tatuya