IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion-07.txt

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Sun, 22 September 2019 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03AD12004C; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 14:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L6Vt8WWl2Zdf; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 14:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3F4B120024; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 14:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.7.112] (unknown [85.104.108.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA19A862A8; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:36:54 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion-07.txt
To: Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
References: <156903961357.5092.16907354634703727132.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <21D937AA-0B27-4E8D-BB6E-99452F72AC30@cisco.com> <CALx6S35Mehd_LUMt_gL=nr_B29vTND4KfYjjiiPtBaj_JjyWFQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wncc3Gtgeb1cWJ-kqDHJVdsf7vR+_BH3tXXjw0ZPR=ZA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkv6dEpCHKMnVrk=u82ZQjm5roBrJY+5qYRUad46-gGkw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <0628b25a-157e-43bc-34ab-0d9c36103cdd@gont.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:36:46 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERkv6dEpCHKMnVrk=u82ZQjm5roBrJY+5qYRUad46-gGkw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/RzRzXOkvQQTMju56Ke8zaJW9_wc>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:37:01 -0000

On 22/9/19 16:52, Robert Raszuk wrote:
[....]
> 
> Of course I guess you can question if TI-LFA with SRv6 is something IPv6
> want to support with SR - but as there is some demand I guess more
> rationale is required then just say "No". 

It's the other way around: if anything, you need to make a case why you
want to break IPv6. The onus is on you.

Allowing EH insertion turns what was an e2e protocol into something else.


-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email