Re: draft-kaiser-nd-pd-00.txt (was: Announcing Prefix Delegation extensions to ND)

[Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>]

Alexandru Petrescu <[e-mail]> wrote:
    AP> Well yes, the prefix allocated to a vehicle when using NEMO is
    AP> actually DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation RFC6276.  In that RFC the
    AP> presence of HA is mandatory.

    AP> But some times HA may not be available, e.g. in remote areas or
    AP> uncovered areas.  There, one would still want vehicles to
    AP> inter-communicate.

Yes, so if there is no uplink, then there is no addresses, so really,
it's not an address allocation problem, it's a routing problem.

    AP> Direct communication between vehicles in the absence from
    AP> infrastructure is what is being experimented in some settings,
    AP> although I agree they may not be reflected in ISO works.  I can
    AP> speak of the EU project I work on with these V2V and V2V2I
    AP> use-cases.

    >> For the scenario involving the roadside and the vehicle, the
    >> prefix can be exchanged as proposed by Lee
    >> (draft-jhlee-mext-mnpp). The solution from Lee is being
    >> integrated in the ISO TC204 standards related to ISO 21210.

    AP> I am happy to learn that draft-jhlee-mext-mnpp work is
    AP> integrated in ISO TC204 work.

Can you tell us how/if we can view this TC204 work?
Also, I can not find draft-jhlee-mext-mnpp. Is there a typo?

-- 
Michael Richardson
-on the road-