IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: CRH "mapping table" and OAM - Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Tue, 26 May 2020 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CE63A0440 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2020 13:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sfvPngiB1GkI for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2020 13:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 936253A041A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 May 2020 13:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7474C; Tue, 26 May 2020 22:26:02 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:date:date:subject:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-type:message-id:from:from :received:received; s=mail; t=1590524760; bh=ooc6MMtfLHfJgMRZ9Eg RLNlQXh2G28S8tQV77a9x+4M=; b=CrJ28wMVzilkVBr6StmVJmZA3sv3xKCYIP1 y6BoSoXhNvdjp3M/FYdu0hTICSl56Yx64pq6mQ7mIUtzxHyUfi2mKUPaH7Vb1YnL ABEo6fkH0lhuaJnSQMFx/xI89FL2zKgTwc3XCfrZy7y9hP5rIUVVuZrN1p38ng2B fWUHgVAI=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id HhrhF3aFfreO; Tue, 26 May 2020 22:26:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:3de2:643b:8141:1b51] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:3de2:643b:8141:1b51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B193149; Tue, 26 May 2020 22:25:59 +0200 (CEST)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Message-Id: <E525C744-DDA5-4F09-97FB-FFD3E16B6C29@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8F356475-AB6D-4EB0-868C-0688CE03FD0C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: CRH "mapping table" and OAM - Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 22:25:58 +0200
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR13MB23349C2A47C5C1A00E33CDDD85B00@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
References: <759F2FDB-C5ED-4FFA-9983-AE5D201E7CC5@cisco.com> <DM6PR05MB63480B378F943AA6B29A0CD8AEB00@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMFC2pGuajw+bxRXJen634QLoAOV1ibNciJ3mgybb7TS9w@mail.gmail.com> <SN6PR13MB23349C2A47C5C1A00E33CDDD85B00@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/TRJBp6O3Ov6eMBeqHz3Aza94-Og>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 20:26:08 -0000

> There are many documents in SPRING WG to extend the SRv6 solution ([RFC8402]) for the specific purpose of minimizing the MTU overhead and/or supporting very long SID-lists on legacy hardware. It seems to me that CRH is just another solution. If not compatible with others, is there any benefit of having another solution?

Yes, there is
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email