IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 26 October 2021 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FAF33A108B; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ibu-gjP8_vY0; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 654AA3A10A2; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:b877:1ebd:d558:e93a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00D6F600CED; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 17:05:53 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1635257154; bh=pUDef9bD5hm7M2Z9eTqaLEYDv1P32pNBXFuErtoAcIY=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=IVRkP+ForJ1MlAaV0YpuEdypj0eUY5tcZ35qD4hEmpYcCPTH8doCUsKSdkBa1Ff2y LuMftgaDXeGuSBipI2Rfe7rQEJhgmxTiB5S8e2/j3wAiNoh8zJ+xwxTDG2i3stIulv i4nJfMCzVIH9k9odVZFeBwguwUaMQzR73YylI/M8=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.20.0.1.32\))
Subject: Re: Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <c675af5bd2c745f9b4bca328eb3886a8@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 17:05:53 +0300
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "6man-chairs@ietf.org" <6man-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <12E2D1C2-D107-4DB0-BD5D-30C1784A9A44@eggert.org>
References: <162824256748.9012.15703111505505730185@ietfa.amsl.com> <5A3DB972-AC12-40A2-970D-1846F916AD6E@eggert.org> <c8e1f6518f344594ab962947edda7948@huawei.com> <3402ee98-b072-b862-a55a-44ff9bfa9992@gmail.com> <dedd91aef6cc41ecb61b6a0bd835eb53@huawei.com> <FA0D9A71-49F8-4D48-B82D-C1B3375376F1@eggert.org> <884c9d3f52b7472ca123e056a9030290@huawei.com> <c4c389d3716f4caeb990fde406364f62@huawei.com> <7015F886-4ED0-4F97-8473-AE9405A7157A@eggert.org> <2900f16eaf104129bb4621b639e02abe@huawei.com> <c675af5bd2c745f9b4bca328eb3886a8@huawei.com>
To: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 00D6F600CED.A3CE9
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/TSr31DEhseoBF4KkK1FxqoNE3X0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:06:08 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-10-22, at 16:55, Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> wrote:
> I just submitted the new version. Please check whether the revised section 5.3 clarifies and addresses your concerns.

thank you, I have cleared my Discuss.

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email