[IPv6]Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag-02: (with COMMENT)

["Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <[e-mail]>]

About the separation between the 6MAN I-D and the SNAC simple draft, as I wrote in my own YES ballot and as Jen Linkova wrote in her shepherd’s write up, the process of ‘carving out’ the RA flag out of the snac-simple was agreed between the SNAC/6MAN chairs & ADs (Erik & Eric) during a SNAC WG meeting at IETF119: “Interaction of this draft with
the SNAC was discussed extensively at IETF119 and on the mailing lists“

Hope this clarifies the situation,

Regards,

-éric

From: Deb Cooley via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
Date: Tuesday, 3 December 2024 at 14:30
To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag-02: (with COMMENT)
Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for both Shivan Kaul Sahib and Tomas Fossati for their reviews.  Both
have suggestions that impact Security Considerations, and both suggestions
should be considered either for this draft or for draft-ietf-snac-simple.  It
would be nice to hear whether these suggestions are being considered, in
addition to which draft is considered appropriate.

I also echo Paul's comment about the separation of this draft and
draft-ietf-snac-simple.  It would seem logical to have put them together.