Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-05: (with COMMENT)
"Spencer Dawkins" <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 09 April 2015 13:50 UTC
Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41BF1A1A9E; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 06:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CH36neXQSgGc; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 06:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22ED1A1A8A; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 06:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-05: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.13.0.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150409135057.13211.34274.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:50:57 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/W3dx1eLXIQ4az-pSgrqwRaZG0XA>
Cc: ot@cisco.com, ipv6@ietf.org, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 13:50:59 -0000
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-05: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for working through my discuss (and Alia's comment), which was --- I'm piling on Barry's Comment as a Discuss, which should be easy to discuss, but ... in this text: 3. Configuring the use of retransmissions Implementations of this specification MAY provide a configuration option to enable or disable the use of such potentially infinite retransmissions. If the implementation provides such a configuration option, it MUST be able to enable/disable retransmissions on a per- interface basis. You can tell me that it's a LAN, so the transport ADs can go back to sleep, but I was surprised that this configuration option was a MAY. I was also surprised that there was no guidance about the default setting (on or off), but let's start with the MAY. IP does get tunneled to new and exciting places ... and infinite retransmissions are infinite ... --- Extreme nit alert: In general, the delay may be unacceptable in some scenarios. would make more sense to me without the "in general".
- Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-6man-resilient… Spencer Dawkins