Re: [76attendees] Rogue IPv6 RA
Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Tue, 10 November 2009 01:43 UTC
Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F4928C28C; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:43:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kg6RKWZxW1KQ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:43:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.33.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A3F28C197; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:43:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spaceape8.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape8.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.142]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id nAA1hw1a026542; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:43:58 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1257817438; bh=IpEqAkU8Kvc/X/na1CZwY1So/BU=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=YmdO4+nosgEj9jtpaday3UrcNQJH+rdSHu64Uj1/3JT47WPn/cM9cwWBaMI5LZKRq i4qklWlejNZ/544sJoznQ==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=MjaOcKPYBBJi5X/MlQsgw1qCEdnflXiS1TWgWlNFbAlSGP9/VfIs5i5l6ELH6/+4k aXyiEezM2kuLCWPgp01GQ==
Received: from iwn8 (iwn8.prod.google.com [10.241.68.72]) by spaceape8.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id nAA1htbC004728; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:43:55 -0800
Received: by iwn8 with SMTP id 8so2943140iwn.33 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:43:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.48.210 with SMTP id s18mr296083ibf.3.1257817434780; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:43:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9EC1CCE4-CB5C-4491-8339-A1497475A1D7@nttv6.net>
References: <m24op4b94l.wl%sekiya@wide.ad.jp> <66346671-3773-4A08-94CB-7A777C105631@nttv6.net> <m2my2w9dda.wl%sekiya@wide.ad.jp> <9EC1CCE4-CB5C-4491-8339-A1497475A1D7@nttv6.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:43:54 +0000
Message-ID: <2e8c64260911091743u2f33241h5988f3a97f80814a@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [76attendees] Rogue IPv6 RA
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
To: Arifumi Matsumoto <arifumi@nttv6.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@wide.ad.jp>, ipv6@ietf.org, 76attendees@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:43:36 -0000
> If the latter paragraph only should be executed, the address given > by rogue RA remains, right ? My reading would be that on receipt of a 0-lifetime RA that only the second paragraph would be executed (lifetime timeout). However, all hosts receiving the 0-lifetime RA would then have to recompute the next-hop, which in /some/ cases may require sending a RS (which the rogue RA node would presumably hear and re-answer). (Of course I haven't verified this against any implementation :)
- Re: [76attendees] Rogue IPv6 RA Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: [76attendees] Rogue IPv6 RA Erik Kline
- Re: [76attendees] Rogue IPv6 RA Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: [76attendees] Rogue IPv6 RA Erik Kline