IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPv6] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ls-6man-ipcomp-exclude-transport-layer-00.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 24 October 2022 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79E8C14CE33 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.707
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.707 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (bad RSA signature)" header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lymGdrX1Yshd for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A89BC14CE2B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:17:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (ipv6.dooku.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:6::1]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 642671F450; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 15:17:51 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1666624671; bh=cKvaJbGyveOtoRDZD5eruC7LDbMBr3yheEDwiG5FGoQ=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:From; b=Pinl9ocrr1QWzXZXyX3GUMDHwc8SHpwV1BGcE5No9xnPQc4VIlLRJUhDHtUeyOYQe l+Se+xlEEkt/G+K+eizSDXaK07s9Gitu2vReIzbi71w4MXk34G4+mKcPSjOOOddN+W 26nQPjoL41C+jop0prQWjpl0ksvOh/LPm/SbgZN9kW0IZOQ8SrZFZG8K8DSjjPHPRx orB6aWj09cEPTuOUO/S6Kv55TXxNavk9l9ZMVEye0Nia00Qqm3bnAROxIGPhT/sV/p D8ZqN4p8OOv6kdzV8tFouslg4fFXgfNb8hMsII6rD2L5YZ3FqK/XhIX8olAGtLxjO0 +mLYhmJHugnWw==
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7A66CA02EA; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 11:17:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7821BA02E9; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 17:17:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Shihang(Vincent)" <shihang9@huawei.com>
cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <c14cbcafab364b95b7fd801ab5ceff1c@huawei.com>
References: <166623196798.53565.15728669594489380137@ietfa.amsl.com> <14cee747bfbb464686a840996116a6c7@huawei.com> <1226626.1666601313@dyas> <c14cbcafab364b95b7fd801ab5ceff1c@huawei.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Shihang(Vincent)" <shihang9@huawei.com> message dated "Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:28:59 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 17:17:46 +0200
Message-ID: <1293203.1666624666@dyas>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/YCMj2kf8dCBmCAnbogeQXJxS108>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ls-6man-ipcomp-exclude-transport-layer-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 15:18:00 -0000

Shihang(Vincent) <shihang9@huawei.com> wrote:
    > But the IPSec WG is now concluded. The IPSecME WG is mainly working on
    > the security aspect of IPSec. Actually the compression is orthogonal to
    > the security.
    > Which WG do you think is most appropriate for extension to IPComp?

IPsecme.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email